Her bleeding was not well controlled with the device so she progressed to having a hysterectomy [device ineffective].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from a physician via company representative and designated point of contact (dpoc), referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's medical conditions included pregnancy and delivery and her current condition included uterine atony.Her past drugs/allergies and concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On (b)(6) 2023 (thursday), the patient was placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via intrauterine route for postpartum bleeding control by the attending physician, however, her bleeding was not well controlled with the device so she progressed to having a hysterectomy (device ineffective).Reportedly, the incident occurred overnight and the device was removed on (b)(6) 2023 (friday).The suspected cause of the postpartum hemorrhage was reported as uterine atony.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), the lot number and the serial number were not available.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was considered as serious due to the required intervention.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.(health effects - health impact per annex f): 4624 surgical intervention (one or more surgical procedures was required, or an existing procedure changed).
|