• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CONCORD MANUFACTURING 2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 190766
Device Problems Thermal Decomposition of Device (1071); Fire (1245); Smoking (1585)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/29/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
 
Event Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported to fresenius technical services that a 2008t machine had a burned bibag interface board.The reported issue was discovered during troubleshooting.The machine was initially pulled from service when the machine would not power on.A blank display and a constant audible alarm were received.The motherboard and display assembly were replaced.Upon powering the machine back on a flash was observed coming from the bibag interface board and the burnt board was discovered.Additional information was obtained during follow-up with the biomed.The biomed stated that corrosion was also identified on the motherboard from bleach damage and was replaced along with the display assembly to address the power and display issues.The biomed powered the machine on and a flame appeared inside the card cage during the boot sequence.The biomed powered the machine down to put out the flame.The flame extinguished into smoke which dissipated.The facility smoke detectors were not triggered by the flame or smoke nor was a smoke extinguisher required to address the damage.The biomed determined the source of the flame to be the bibag interface board which also appeared to be burned.The biomed stated that the machine has approximately 27,000 hours.The biomed could not confirm whether the part was original to the fresenius machine but confirmed the part had not been replaced in the past year.The biomed stated that the bibag interface board was replaced to resolve the thermal damage and that the machine is back in service without any issues.Additionally, the biomed confirmed that there was no damage observed on any other components, or any other additional issues, associated with the burned bibag interface board.The biomed confirmed that a patient was not connected to the machine at the time of the incident and there was no harm to any patients or individuals because of this malfunction.The biomed confirmed that the bibag interface board is available for return to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, h3 plant investigation: the bibag interface board was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius field service technician (fst).A records review was performed on the reported serial number.An investigation of the device manufacturing records was conducted by the manufacturer.There were no non-conformances, or any associated rework identified during the manufacturing process which could be related to the reported event.In addition, the device history record (dhr) review confirmed the results of the in-progress and final quality control (qc) testing met all requirements.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.
 
Event Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported to fresenius technical services that a 2008t machine had a burned bibag interface board.The reported issue was discovered during troubleshooting.The machine was intiailly pulled from service when the machine would not power on.A blank display and a constant audible alarm were received.The motherboard and display assembly were replaced.Upon powering the machine back on a flash was observed coming from the bibag interface board and the burnt board was discovered.Additional information was obtained during follow-up with the biomed.The biomed stated that corrosion was also identified on the motherboard from bleach damage and was replaced along with the display assembly to address the power and display issues.The biomed powered the machine on and a flame appeared inside the card cage during the boot sequence.The biomed powered the machine down to put out the flame.The flame extinguished into smoke which dissipated.The facility smoke detectors were not triggered by the flame or smoke nor was a smoke extinguisher required to address the damage.The biomed determined the source of the flame to be the bibag interface board which also appeared to be burned.The biomed stated that the machine has approximately (b)(4).The biomed could not confirm whether the part was original to the fresenius machine but confirmed the part had not been replaced in the past year.The biomed stated that the bibag interface board was replaced to resolve the thermal damage and that the machine is back in service without any issues.Additionally, the biomed confirmed that there was no damage observed on any other components, or any other additional issues, associated with the burned bibag interface board.The biomed confirmed that a patient was not connected to the machine at the time of the incident and there was no harm to any patients or individuals because of this malfunction.The biomed confirmed that the bibag interface board is available for return to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Event Description
A user facility biomedical technician (biomed) reported to fresenius technical services that a 2008t machine had a burned bibag interface board.The reported issue was discovered during troubleshooting.The machine was initially pulled from service when the machine would not power on.A blank display and a constant audible alarm were received.The motherboard and display assembly were replaced.Upon powering the machine back on a flash was observed coming from the bibag interface board and the burnt board was discovered.Additional information was obtained during follow-up with the biomed.The biomed stated that corrosion was also identified on the motherboard from bleach damage and was replaced along with the display assembly to address the power and display issues.The biomed powered the machine on and a flame appeared inside the card cage during the boot sequence.The biomed powered the machine down to put out the flame.The flame extinguished into smoke which dissipated.The facility smoke detectors were not triggered by the flame or smoke nor was a smoke extinguisher required to address the damage.The biomed determined the source of the flame to be the bibag interface board which also appeared to be burned.The biomed stated that the machine has approximately (b)(4) hours.The biomed could not confirm whether the part was original to the fresenius machine but confirmed the part had not been replaced in the past year.The biomed stated that the bibag interface board was replaced to resolve the thermal damage and that the machine is back in service without any issues.Additionally, the biomed confirmed that there was no damage observed on any other components, or any other additional issues, associated with the burned bibag interface board.The biomed confirmed that a patient was not connected to the machine at the time of the incident and there was no harm to any patients or individuals because of this malfunction.The biomed confirmed that the bibag interface board is available for return to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, h3 plant investigation: the bibag interface board was returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.The board was returned with thermal damage to capacitor c63.There is no damage to any nearby components on the board.The board was installed (in as-received condition) onto test machine for testing.A rinse program was completed without any failures.Dialysis mode functioned properly without any failures.Self-test program completed without any failures.The bibag fill and empty program was performed without failures.The bibag gen2 board functioned properly despite of the damage capacitor c63.The reported issue was confirmed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
2008T HEMODIALYSIS SYSTEM W/BIBAG
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
CONCORD MANUFACTURING
director, quality systems
4040 nelson avenue
concord CA 94520
Manufacturer (Section G)
CONCORD MANUFACTURING
director, quality systems
4040 nelson avenue
concord CA 94520
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key17664292
MDR Text Key322432070
Report Number0002937457-2023-01335
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861100910
UDI-Public00840861100910
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K150708
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number190766
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/29/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/31/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/06/2023
10/19/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/09/2023
10/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/09/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-