It was reported that, after a tka was performed in 2015, the patient experienced depression of the tibial baseplate.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2023 to address this adverse event.Revision of baseplate was determined as best course of action using s+n revision system with stem and cones.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
H3, h6: the reported event was analyzed.Although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the genesis ii non-porous tibial baseplate size 5 rt.Therefore, no investigation is deemed for the other device.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation stated that the requested clinical documentation was not available, and the current patient status is unknown; therefore, definitive clinical factors which could have contributed to the reported event could not be concluded.The impact to the patient beyond the reported baseplate ¿depression¿ and subsequent revision using s&n revision components including stem and cones cannot not be determined based on the limited information provided.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that improper fixation of the components could cause possible adverse effects.Also, the implant can become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.The patient should be warned of surgical risks, and made aware of possible adverse effects.This has been identified as a warning and precaution.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include abnormal loading of limb, alignment and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|