Model Number 20000IS |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Rupture (2208); Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451)
|
Event Date 08/03/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event is captured by edwards lifesciences under complaint #: (b)(4).B2: other serious- leaflet flail.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.Not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
Edwards received notification of a pascal precision procedure in mitral position where during the procedure, a leaflet flail was observed after several grasping attempts.The patient had a tethered posterior mitral leaflet (pml).During grasping pml the device clocked unintentionally and was in general difficult to grasp due to leaflet curling, after several grasping attempts in p3 a minor to mediocre flail was visible which could not be seen before.The heart frequency had been influenced with amiodoron in order to reduce heart rate until it was suitable for grasping.Heart rate was reduced from approx.120 to 60 bpm.After that a flail could be seen which most likely occurred during grasping attempts.After that it was decided to bailout the p10 device and switch to pascal ace.The flail in p3 could be caught with one ace and another ace was put beside to reduce remaining jet.A small jet without eccentric mainly lateral to the 2 ace devices remained.Another ace was not preferred due to remaining mitral valve area of only 1,7cm2 and also gradient of 2 with a heart rate of 60 under the influence of amiodoron.The physician wished for a better result because it was a young patient on the heart transplant list.Nevertheless, the procedure was beneficial for the patient and the flail that occurred could be fixed.Starting mr was grade 4 and post-procedural grade 2.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complaint for chordae damaged in attempt to capture leaflet was confirmed with other empirical evidence.No manufacturing non-conformities were found as a result of the complaint evaluation.Available information suggests that patient factors (heart frequency 120 and higher, a tethered posterior mitral leaflet (pml), leaflet curling), and procedural use (a flail could be seen, which most likely occurred during several grasping attempts) may have contributed to this adverse event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H6 device code updated to: patient device interaction problem.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|