SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC. ATELLICA IM BR 27.29 (BR); SYSTEM, TEST, IMMUNOLOGICAL, ANTIGEN, TUMOR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
High Test Results (2457)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/09/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A customer from the united states obtained a falsely elevated br 27.29 (br) patient sample result on atellica im analyzer.The initial result was reported to the physician(s), who questioned the result.The same sample was measured on an alternate testing method (advia centaur) and the result was lower compared to the atellica im result.The interpretation of results section of the atellica im br 27.29 (br) instructions for use (ifu) states: "results of this assay should always be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's medical history, clinical presentation, and other findings." siemens healthcare diagnostics is investigating.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer obtained a falsely elevated br 27.29 (br) patient sample result on atellica im analyzer.The initial result was reported to the physician(s), who questioned the result.The same sample was measured on an alternate testing method (advia centaur) and the result was lower compared to the atellica im result.There are no known reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the falsely elevated br 27.29 (br) result.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens filed the initial mdr 1219913-2023-00183 on 05-sep-2023.Additional information 24-jan-2024: a customer from the united states obtained a falsely elevated br 27.29 (br) patient sample result (55.06 u/ml) on atellica im analyzer.The initial result was reported to the physician(s), who questioned the result.The same sample was measured on an alternate testing method (advia centaur) and the result (34 u/ml) was lower compared to the atellica im result.Reviewing the data, siemens identified that the lot calibration used to generate the 55.06 u/ml result with sample 58596460 had not been verified with quality control (qc) in over a week.The qc that recovered acceptably prior to sample 58596460 used a different pack calibration but the 55.06 u/ml result was not generated with that pack.When the pack with the pack calibration used for qc was used up, the analyzer switched to using a different pack which did not have a pack calibration, so the analyzer defaulted to the lot calibration that was used to generate the 55.06 u/ml result.The qc the customer ran with the lot calibration after sample 58596460 was tested recovered high so the customer recalibrated.Siemens reviewed the calibrations and observed differences in relative light units (rlus).Siemens performed an offline calculation using the sample 58596460 relative light units with the new calibration and showed the sample 58596460 result would have been 34 u/ml if the br pack had been calibrated before testing the sample.Based on the available information, the cause of the difference in calibrator rlus between the lot calibration and the new calibration could not be determined but siemens cannot rule out reagent shipping/handling.The customer is operational.In section h6, the investigation finding, and investigation conclusion codes were updated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|