|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN FILTER |
Device Problems
Malposition of Device (2616); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 02/10/2020 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.At some time, post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter had detached, perforated, and tilted.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.The medical records included images.The image review was documented in the medical records.Six ct images and one plain film image of the abdomen were reviewed.The images depict an ivc filter in the inferior vena cava.The filter is incompletely imaged but at least one ¿leg¿ appears to lie separate from the body of the device.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Post filter deployment, computed tomography scan of abdomen showed the filter had tilted with apex against the caval wall.Multiple struts perforated the inferior vena cava.Two struts were fractured.One fragment remained in the vena cava, the other perforated the inferior vena cava, and projected anterior to the abdominal aorta.Review of computed tomography scan appeared to also show involvement with the vertebral body.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported perforation of inferior vena cava, filter tilt and filter limb detachment.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported through the litigation process that a vena cava filter was placed in a patient after being diagnosed with lower extremity deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.At some time, post filter deployment, it was alleged that the filter had detached, perforated, and tilted.The device has not been removed and there were no reported attempts made to retrieve the filter.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|