• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ADVANTIO; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ADVANTIO; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number K087
Device Problems Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Inappropriate or Unexpected Reset (2959)
Patient Problem Dizziness (2194)
Event Date 08/28/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker presented to the emergency department with complaint of dizziness.Review of an electrogram (egm) showed large pacing spikes consistent with the device operating in vvi at 72 beats per minute (bpm).It was suspected that the device had reverted to safety mode.It was noted the device showed a battery status of one year remaining at a previous in clinic follow up approximately 2 months ago.The physician planned to have the patient contact their regular cardiologist to schedule a device replacement procedure on an unknown future date.No adverse patient effects were reported.This device remains in service.Additional information has been requested, however, no additional information is available or known at this time.If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being filed to correct field: d6a: implant date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker presented to the emergency department with complaint of dizziness.Review of an electrogram (egm) showed large pacing spikes consistent with the device operating in vvi at 72 beats per minute (bpm).It was suspected that the device had reverted to safety mode.It was noted the device showed a battery status of one year remaining at a previous in clinic follow up approximately 2 months ago.The physician planned to have the patient contact their regular cardiologist to schedule a device replacement procedure on an unknown future date.No adverse patient effects were reported.This device remains in service.Additional information has been requested, however, no additional information is available or known at this time.If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker presented to the emergency department with complaint of dizziness.Review of an electrogram (egm) showed large pacing spikes consistent with the device operating in vvi at 72 beats per minute (bpm).It was suspected that the device had reverted to safety mode.It was noted the device showed a battery status of one year remaining at a previous in clinic follow up approximately 2 months ago.The physician planned to have the patient contact their regular cardiologist to schedule a device replacement procedure on an unknown future date.No adverse patient effects were reported.This device remains in service.Additional information has been requested; however, no additional information is available or known at this time.If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.It was reported that surgical intervention was undertaken.The device was explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This product is being evaluated in our post market quality assurance laboratory.This report will be updated when evaluation is complete.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient implanted with this pacemaker presented to the emergency department with complaint of dizziness.Review of an electrogram (egm) showed large pacing spikes consistent with the device operating in vvi at 72 beats per minute (bpm).It was suspected that the device had reverted to safety mode.It was noted the device showed a battery status of one year remaining at a previous in clinic follow up approximately 2 months ago.The physician planned to have the patient contact their regular cardiologist to schedule a device replacement procedure on an unknown future date.No adverse patient effects were reported.This device remains in service.Additional information has been requested, however, no additional information is available or known at this time.If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.It was reported that surgical intervention was undertaken.The device was explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.The return of the product is expected.At this time, the product has not been returned.If the product is returned, analysis will be performed and this report would be updated at that time.The product has been received for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This product is being evaluated in our post market quality assurance laboratory.This report will be updated when evaluation is complete.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Interrogation of the device determined it had undergone resets and that bradycardia therapy remained available.The system resets occurred during a telemetry session and caused the device to enter safety mode.Engineers determined that this device was demonstrating behavior consistent with a high internal cell impedance within the battery.The high internal impedance resulted in the system resets due to temporary high-power consumption and subsequent reversion to safety mode operation.Boston scientific has issued a field safety notice regarding ingenio extended life (el) and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p) devices that may exhibit this behavior.This particular device is included in the high impedance in ingenio extended life (el) pacemaker and crt-p advisory population.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ADVANTIO
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17694412
MDR Text Key322777409
Report Number2124215-2023-48456
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/12/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/15/2015
Device Model NumberK087
Device Catalogue NumberK087
Device Lot Number111224
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/28/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/06/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/28/2023
10/09/2023
02/07/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/06/2023
10/30/2023
02/12/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/18/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-