Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated the patient with this device experienced dyspareunia, unable to urinate, vaginal pain, cystocele, enterocele, vaginal foreign body, voiding dysfunction, recurrent incontinence, complete vaginal vault prolapse, cystourethrocele, rectal intussusception, erythematous vaginal tissue at introitus, palpable device present at approximate 2 inches into vagina at right posterior and lateral wall, husband feels a poking sensation during intercourse, vaginal exam noted bluish material either suture or device material, and device exposure.The patient had removal of vaginal foreign body (prolene suture) under unknown anesthesia.Patient had laparoscopic robotic assisted abdominal graft revision, abdominal enterocele repair, release of sacrospinous fixation, vaginal device revision, vaginal graft revision, repair of bladder laceration, anterior repair, cystoscopy and urethrolysis under general anesthesia.Patient also had a robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, device explanation, enterocele repair, cystoscopy, fascia harvest for sacrocolpopexy and abdominal graft revision under general anesthesia.
|