• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD VERITOR ¿ AT-HOME COVID-19 TEST; NOT CLASSIFIED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD VERITOR ¿ AT-HOME COVID-19 TEST; NOT CLASSIFIED Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 256094
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/16/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during use with bd veritor ¿ at-home covid-19 test multiple false positive results were obtained.Confirmatory pcr testing was performed and results were negative.There was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer¿s facility used bd test to test for covid, and 36 were positives and 7 negatives.Customer stopped testing the patients.Tested them again with other tests, antigen first.They were negative, and pcr¿s.They were negative.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Eua # (b)(4).D.4.Medical device expiration date: unknown.E.1.Initial reporter state: address information was not able to be obtained, therefore, md was used as a place holder.H.3.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.H.4.Device manufacture date: unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6 investigation summary: this summarizes the investigation results regarding a complaint that alleges ¿false positive results¿ using the bd veritor at home covid-19 test (material # 256094), batch number unknown.According to the report, the customer¿s facility initially used bd veritor test for covid, which yielded 36 positive and 7 negative results.The customer decided to stop testing the patients using this method.Subsequently the patients were tested again using antigen test, which returned negative results, and then with pcr test, which also showed negative results.Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate all complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, review of software updates, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples, if applicable.Batch history record (bhr) review and retain sample testing could not be performed because a batch number was not provided.A review of bug fixes and software updates was conducted, and no issues related to this complaint were identified.This complaint cannot be confirmed.The root cause could not be identified.A trend analysis for false positive was conducted, no adverse trend was identified.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during use with bd veritor ¿ at-home covid-19 test multiple false positive results were obtained.Confirmatory pcr testing was performed and results were negative.There was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer¿s facility used bd test to test for covid, and 36 were positives and 7 negatives.Customer stopped testing the patients.Tested them again with other tests, antigen first.They were negative, and pcr¿s.They were negative.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during use with bd veritor ¿ at-home covid-19 test multiple false positive results were obtained.Confirmatory pcr testing was performed and results were negative.There was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer¿s facility used bd test to test for covid, and 36 were positives and 7 negatives.Customer stopped testing the patients.Tested them again with other tests, antigen first.They were negative, and pcr¿s.They were negative.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6.Investigation summary: this summarizes the investigation results regarding a complaint that alleges ¿false positive results¿ using the bd veritor at home covid-19 test (material # 256094), batch number unknown.According to the report, the customer¿s facility initially used bd veritor test for covid, which yielded 36 positive and 7 negative results.The customer decided to stop testing the patients using this method.Subsequently the patients were tested again using antigen test, which returned negative results, and then with pcr test, which also showed negative results.Bd quality performs a systematic approach to investigate all complaints.This approach involves review of manufacturing batch history records, review of software updates, testing of retention samples, and testing of customer returned samples, if applicable.Batch history record (bhr) review and retain sample testing could not be performed because a batch number was not provided.A review of bug fixes and software updates was conducted, and no issues related to this complaint were identified.This complaint cannot be confirmed.The root cause could not be identified.A trend analysis for false positive was conducted, no adverse trend was identified.Bd quality will continue to monitor for trends.H3 other text : see h.10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD VERITOR ¿ AT-HOME COVID-19 TEST
Type of Device
NOT CLASSIFIED
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer suh
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8448235433
MDR Report Key17699980
MDR Text Key322855041
Report Number1119779-2023-00972
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QKP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number256094
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/16/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/07/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/12/2023
09/12/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/15/2023
10/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-