The investigation determined that a lower than expected vitros nbnp2 result was obtained when a spanish preanalytical quality monitoring program (seqc) proficiency sample was tested using vitros nbnp2 lot 0610 on a vitros xt7600 integrated system.A definitive assignable cause of the event was not determined.Vitros nbnp2 lot 0610 was only recently put into use on the customer¿s instrument, therefore there were limited qc results to verify historical vitros nbnp2 lot 0610 performance.Additionally, the customer had only processed one of the three levels of controls leading up to the event, meaning the performance of vitros nbnp2 lot 0610 throughout its measuring range was not verified.Therefore, a vitros nbnp2 reagent issue cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event.However, the qcs processed leading up to the event were acceptable and ongoing tracking and trending of complaint data did not identify any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros nbnp2 lot 0610.An instrument issue cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event, as no diagnostic precision testing was conducted to verify the performance of the vitros xt7600 integrated system.Improper handling of the seqc proficiency sample cannot be ruled out as a contributor to the event, as no information was provided on how the customer prepared the seqc proficiency sample or the correct handling protocol for the proficiency sample.It is possible the mean result of the seqc sample (322 pg/ml) was a value comprised of vitros nt-probnp results and vitros nbnp2 results and therefore an inaccurate target value, however, this could not be confirmed.
|