• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V
Device Problems Degraded (1153); Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Establishment name: (b)(6) medical center.The device was returned to olympus for inspection, and the customer's reported issue ¿unable to obtain white balance¿ was not confirmed.The following findings were also noted during device evaluation: bending section pinhole, forceps pinhole, operating part liquid leakage, angle down, light guide bundle break, tip cover discoloration, bending section bond chip, insertion tube rotation mechanism damage, light guide snake tube scratches, and video cable scratches.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or if any additional information is provided by the user facility.
 
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus that the uretero-reno videoscope was unable to obtain white balance.Upon inspection and evaluation, there was peeling of the insertion part coating.There was no report of patient harm or user injury associated with this event.This medical device report (mdr) is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunctions found during incoming inspection and evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the approved final investigation.Section d4 was corrected with information that was inadvertently omitted from the initial report.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, the definitive root cause of the peeled coating could not be determined.It is possible that the coating peeled due to incorrect handling.The instruction manual identifies the following verbiage, which may have prevented the phenomenon: ¿do not bend the endoscope insertion section, universal cord, or video cable into small bends (less than 10 cm in diameter).Doing so may damage it.When rotating the insertion tube, do not hold the insertion tube with excessive force.The insertion tube may be damaged.Do not use excessive force to rotate the insertion tube when the insertion tube rotation/fixation dial index is positioned at the operation section index "l" (locked state).The insertion tube may be damaged.¿ olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer (Section G)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key17739237
MDR Text Key323413159
Report Number3002808148-2023-09793
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K072957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/17/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/17/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/13/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/15/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/22/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-