Catalog Number CS-15402-E |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Unraveled Material (1664)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 08/24/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during insertion, the guidewire "is stretched and it is impossible to insert the catheter".Additional information received reported "the overall guidewire was stretched, but the tip was stretched and in addition, split, becoming lodged in the left subclavian vein pathway." and that "control chest x-ray showed that the foreign body was in the left subclavian vein, in the initial location where it had been lodged, the patient was referred and accepted to another institution for pediatric hemodynamics for foreign body removal".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Complaint verification testing could not be performed as no sample was returned for analysis.The instructions for use (ifu) provided with this kit warns the user, "do not apply excessive force in placing or removing catheter or guidewire.Excessive force can cause component damage or breakage.If damage is suspected or withdrawal cannot be easily accomplished, radiographic visualization should be obtained, and further consultation requested.Warning: do not withdraw guidewire against needle bevel to reduce risk of possible severing or damaging of guidewire." a device history record review was performed, and no relevant findings were identified.Without the device to evaluate, the complaint could not be confirmed, and the probable cause could not be determined from the available information.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported during insertion, the guidewire "is stretched and it is impossible to insert the catheter".Additional information received reported "the overall guidewire was stretched, but the tip was stretched and in addition, split, becoming lodged in the left subclavian vein pathway." and that "control chest x-ray showed that the foreign body was in the left subclavian vein, in the initial location where it had been lodged, the patient was referred and accepted to another institution for pediatric hemodynamics for foreign body removal".
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|