• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COAPT LLC CONTROLSEAL ELECTRODE; CUTANEOUS EMG ELECTRODE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COAPT LLC CONTROLSEAL ELECTRODE; CUTANEOUS EMG ELECTRODE Back to Search Results
Device Problems Ambient Temperature Problem (2878); Temperature Problem (3022)
Patient Problems Superficial (First Degree) Burn (2685); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545)
Event Date 04/25/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Patient thermal burn on residual limb during prosthesis wear.After about 8 hours of continued use, patient doffed his prosthetic device and noticed thermal blisters on his residual limb.Upon further inspection, he found consistent hot spots with where other sensors were on the left side of his limb.He also noticed that the battery on that side seemed to have heated up or indented the socket.Patient did not feel any sensation of heat, and had his prosthetic in "freeze mode".Patient confirms he was not in direct heat while wearing the product, indicating that environmental heat exposure was not a likely cause.Patient returned the prosthetic arm system to his prosthetist (clinician) who subsequently send it to the prosthetic hand and battery manufacturer, psyonic (san diego, ca, https://www.Psyonic.Io/) for diagnosis and inspection.The investigation by the prosthetic hand and battery manufacturer, psyonic (san diego, ca, https://www.Psyonic.Io/) determined that a psyonic battery unit installed inside the prosthetic arm system became bent, which caused this battery damage; internal damage within the battery unit resulting in the battery cell overheating.Psyonic's investigation showed that the bending was likely caused by insufficient space within the device and the force of the patient's residual limb against the battery while donning the prosthetic.The excessive heat produced by the damaged battery would have been in close proximity to coapt's electrodes, and the heat would have been conducted from the extreme condition to the patients' skin through the metal of the electrodes, resulting in the minor burns incurred by the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Prosthetic manufacturer indicated that the heat generated by the bent battery was conducted through coapt dome electrodes.Coapt replaced the controller device out of an abundance of caution that the device was possible exposed to heat above operating temperature of 95°f, despite working as normal.Heat conduction is an inherent risk of metal electrodes, the cause of the heat was not due to coapt products.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONTROLSEAL ELECTRODE
Type of Device
CUTANEOUS EMG ELECTRODE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COAPT LLC
303 w institute place ste20
chicago IL 60610
Manufacturer (Section G)
COAPT LLC
303 w institute pl ste200
chicago IL 60610
Manufacturer Contact
blair lock
303 w institte pl ste200
chicago, IL 60610
8442627800
MDR Report Key17772547
MDR Text Key323700707
Report Number3010605876-2023-00001
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GXY
UDI-Device IdentifierB618P1
UDI-Public+B618P1
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K223605
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/12/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/02/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/19/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-