• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION Back to Search Results
Lot Number VMFF120523
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 08/22/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a pericardial effusion occurred and procedure cancellation.A trace baseline pre-existing pericardial effusion was seen prior to the start of the left atrial appendage (laa) closure procedure via transesophageal echocardiography (tee), about 1-2cm around the ventricles.During the procedure, the physician performed transeptal crossing with the versa cross connect system and a watchman access system (was).The femoral vein access was done, then the physician requested 10.000 units of heparin to be administered.As the system was being positioned in a mid/mid position on the small fossa ovalis, the physician ordered the radiofrequency (rf) buzz.Bubbles were observed in the left atrium (la), but could not visualize the versacross rf wire going across due to the anatomy.The versacross rf wire was seen using fluoroscopy imaging and looked as if it did not cross the septum.The physician ordered the rf buzz again, now on the mid-posterior / mid.Right after the transseptal puncture was achieved, it was noticed that the baseline trace pericardial effusion had noticeably increased at the same time as the patient's pressures started to decrease (about 20 min into the procedure).The physician made the decision to abort the watchman procedure and immediately prepped for a pericardiocentesis tap.The physician immediately reversed the heparin with protamine.There was about 300 cc of blood/fluid tapped out of the pericardial space to resolve the effusion.The patient's pressures began to resolve back to normal.The patient was admitted to the hospital for overnight observation.The pericardial effusion was assumed to be in the upper pulmonary vein, as per the physician.Multiple attempts required to track up / drop down into position on septum before tsp was performed.The patient was under plavix (antiplatelet) at the time.It has been defined as a medical reason for the pericardial effusion an aortic aneurysm that made the physician aim more posterior with the transseptal.The act therapeutic during the procedure was within range 200-300.No issues with the devices were reported.In the physicians opinion, the transseptal device contribute to the patient complication.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been received for analysis.The field b5 'describe event or problem" was updated, thus the supplemental report will be field.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a pericardial effusion occurred.A trace baseline pre-existing pericardial effusion was seen prior to the start of the left atrial appendage (laa) closure procedure via transesophageal echocardiography (tee), about 1-2cm around the ventricles.During the procedure, the physician performed transeptal crossing with the versa cross connect system and a watchman access system (was).The femoral vein access was done, then the physician requested 10.000 units of heparin to be administered.As the system was being positioned in a mid/mid position on the small fossa ovalis, the physician ordered the radiofrequency (rf) buzz.Bubbles were observed in the left atrium (la), but could not visualize the versacross rf wire going across due to the anatomy.The versacross rf wire was seen using fluoroscopy imaging and looked as if it did not cross the septum.The physician ordered the rf buzz again, now on the mid-posterior / mid.Right after the transseptal puncture was achieved, it was noticed that the baseline trace pericardial effusion had noticeably increased at the same time as the patient's pressures started to decrease (about 20 min into the procedure).The physician made the decision to abort the watchman procedure and immediately prepped for a pericardiocentesis tap.The physician immediately reversed the heparin with protamine.There was about 300 cc of blood/fluid tapped out of the pericardial space to resolve the effusion.The patient's pressures began to resolve back to normal.The patient was admitted to the hospital for overnight observation.The pericardial effusion was assumed to be in the upper pulmonary vein, as per the physician.Multiple attempts required to track up / drop down into position on septum before tsp was performed.The patient was under plavix (antiplatelet) at the time.It has been defined as a medical reason for the pericardial effusion an aortic aneurysm that made the physician aim more posterior with the transseptal.The act therapeutic during the procedure was within range 200-300.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis.No issues with the devices were reported.In the physicians opinion, the transseptal device contribute to the patient complication.On 27sep2023 was further confirmed that it was intentional for the versacross rf wire to be positioned in the left upper pulmonary vein, and no excessive pressure was applied into the patient anatomy during transseptal.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION
Type of Device
DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5959 trans-canada highway
montreal H4T 1 A1
CA  H4T 1A1
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5825 explorer drive
mississauga, on L4W 5 P6
CA   L4W 5P6
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
dc a330
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17773684
MDR Text Key323728998
Report Number2124215-2023-49359
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRE
UDI-Device Identifier00685447012597
UDI-Public00685447012597
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Lot NumberVMFF120523
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/22/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/19/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/27/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceBlack Or African American
-
-