BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Lot Number VMFD290523 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Defective Device (2588); Component or Accessory Incompatibility (2897); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Material Deformation (2976); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/23/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman laac procedure.An attempt to access superior vena cava utilizing mechanical guidewire has failed, since the physician was unable to advance the versacross dilator and the was sheath over the mechanical guidewire.Also, it could not retract it the mechanical guidewire from the versacross dilator, and a resistance was noticed when trying to withdraw wire from a non-boston scientific introducer sheath.Thus, it was needed to remove the entire system from patient's body, and then the mechanical guidewire was removed from the dilator (in one piece).The mechanical guidewire appeared to be severely kinked with coating possibly separating (seemed fractured/damaged), but in one piece.Hence, the verscross rf w wire was advanced into the patient's body with original dilator and sheath.Procedure continued as normal and was completed successfully.No patient complications were reported.The physician feel like the wire was getting caught while retracting, requiring it to pull with excessive force.The insulation of the mechanical guidewire was stripping off on the distal end.No patient complications occurred.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This is supplemental mdr to report investigation results (mdr aware date 02nov2023).The device was returned for analysis.It was noted during analysis that the coil did not unfurl, the device is in one piece, kinks were noted at the floopy distal end of the wire and stacking of the external coil was present at the distal end of the wire.Also, it was noted that there is no notable kinks on the stiff section (wire body until proximal end, excluding distal floppy section) and various section exhibited section of coating loss.There were multiple locations exhibiting overlapping/misaligned coil, and multiple location with extensive, localized coating wear.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman laac procedure.An attempt to access superior vena cava utilizing mechanical guidewire has failed, since the physician was unable to advance the versacross dilator and the was sheath over the mechanical guidewire.Also, it could not retract it the mechanical guidewire from the versacross dilator, and a resistance was noticed when trying to withdraw wire from a non-boston scientific introducer sheath.Thus, it was needed to remove the entire system from patient's body, and then the mechanical guidewire was removed from the dilator (in one piece).The mechanical guidewire appeared to be severely kinked with coating possibly separating (seemed fractured/damaged), but in one piece.Hence, the verscross rf w wire was advanced into the patient's body with original dilator and sheath.Procedure continued as normal and was completed successfully.No patient complications were reported.The physician feel like the wire was getting caught while retracting, requiring it to pull with excessive force.The insulation of the mechanical guidewire was stripping off on the distal end.No patient complications occurred.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|