• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION Back to Search Results
Lot Number VMFD290523
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Defective Device (2588); Component or Accessory Incompatibility (2897); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Material Deformation (2976); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/23/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman laac procedure.An attempt to access superior vena cava utilizing mechanical guidewire has failed, since the physician was unable to advance the versacross dilator and the was sheath over the mechanical guidewire.Also, it could not retract it the mechanical guidewire from the versacross dilator, and a resistance was noticed when trying to withdraw wire from a non-boston scientific introducer sheath.Thus, it was needed to remove the entire system from patient's body, and then the mechanical guidewire was removed from the dilator (in one piece).The mechanical guidewire appeared to be severely kinked with coating possibly separating (seemed fractured/damaged), but in one piece.Hence, the verscross rf w wire was advanced into the patient's body with original dilator and sheath.Procedure continued as normal and was completed successfully.No patient complications were reported.The physician feel like the wire was getting caught while retracting, requiring it to pull with excessive force.The insulation of the mechanical guidewire was stripping off on the distal end.No patient complications occurred.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This is supplemental mdr to report investigation results (mdr aware date 02nov2023).The device was returned for analysis.It was noted during analysis that the coil did not unfurl, the device is in one piece, kinks were noted at the floopy distal end of the wire and stacking of the external coil was present at the distal end of the wire.Also, it was noted that there is no notable kinks on the stiff section (wire body until proximal end, excluding distal floppy section) and various section exhibited section of coating loss.There were multiple locations exhibiting overlapping/misaligned coil, and multiple location with extensive, localized coating wear.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman laac procedure.An attempt to access superior vena cava utilizing mechanical guidewire has failed, since the physician was unable to advance the versacross dilator and the was sheath over the mechanical guidewire.Also, it could not retract it the mechanical guidewire from the versacross dilator, and a resistance was noticed when trying to withdraw wire from a non-boston scientific introducer sheath.Thus, it was needed to remove the entire system from patient's body, and then the mechanical guidewire was removed from the dilator (in one piece).The mechanical guidewire appeared to be severely kinked with coating possibly separating (seemed fractured/damaged), but in one piece.Hence, the verscross rf w wire was advanced into the patient's body with original dilator and sheath.Procedure continued as normal and was completed successfully.No patient complications were reported.The physician feel like the wire was getting caught while retracting, requiring it to pull with excessive force.The insulation of the mechanical guidewire was stripping off on the distal end.No patient complications occurred.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION
Type of Device
DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5959 trans-canada highway
montreal H4T 1 A1
CA  H4T 1A1
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5825 explorer drive
mississauga, on L4W 5 P6
CA   L4W 5P6
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
dc a330
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17775311
MDR Text Key323753626
Report Number2124215-2023-49406
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRE
UDI-Device Identifier00685447012597
UDI-Public00685447012597
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Lot NumberVMFD290523
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/23/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/19/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/02/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-