Model Number ONYXNG30026X |
Device Problems
Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Remove (1528); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/14/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
An attempt was made to use one onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stent to treat a moderately tortuous, severely calcified lesion 100% chronic total occlusion (cto), in the proximal obtuse marginal (om) artery.The device was inspected with no issues noted.The lesion was pre-dilated.It was reported that stent deformation occurred in vivo during positioning/advancement. after pre-dilation with a balloon the stent did not cross the lesion.An attempt was then made to remove the stent in order to pre-dilate the lesion again, however the stent got stuck in the lesion.The stent was then pulled, but part of the stent detached/dislodged from the delivery system.The stent was removed and another onyx frontier stent of the same size passed smoothly and was implanted successfully. the patient is alive with no injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: the patient had surgical history of coronary artery bypass graft (cabg) surgery with 2 grafts (1 graft to chronic total occlusion (cto) of the right coronary artery (rca) to the posterior descending artery (pda), and 1 graft to cto of the left circumflex artery (lcx) to the obtuse marginal (om1) and left internal mammary artery (lima) to left anterior descending (lad) artery.In may 2023, the patient had an occluded pda graft for which the native artery was opened.Then the patient had an occluded om1 graft which was being treated during this procedure, with the aim to open the native lcx artery.Resistance was noted while advancing the device to the lesion.Excessive force was used.Both femoral and radial access was used for left and right coronaries.The lcx was wired with two non-medtronic guidewires.The guidewires were successfully passed to the calcified legion and the microcatheter was removed.The cto balloons were inserted.Serial dilations were performed starting with 0.75mm diameter, changing different sizes until 2.5mm diameter was reached.After pre-dilation an attempt was made to deliver the stent, however the stent did not cross the lesion.It was later reported that the stent did not detach or dislodge.After more trials to remove the stent, it was successfully removed, but was noted to be damaged.The event ended successfully with no complication to the patient.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: the device was received for analysis.The stent was positioned on the balloon between the marker bands as per position specification, but due to mid stent deformation the stent did not meet visual acceptance specification.Deformation was evident to the mid stent wraps with struts raised.No deformation was evident to the distal tip.The inner lumen patency was verified with a 0.015 inch mandrel.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|