MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 97715 |
Device Problems
High impedance (1291); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Low impedance (2285)
|
Patient Problems
Wound Dehiscence (1154); Erythema (1840); Electric Shock (2554); Fluid Discharge (2686); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Date 07/18/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from multiple sources (patient, manufacturer representative, healthcare provider) regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for unknown indications for use.It was reported patient states that during r echarging she gets shocked like a 9 volt battery.She also states she can feel the electricity travel from the recharge paddle to the ipg and front the ipg to the recharge paddle.Also electrodes 2,3,4 ,5,8, and 15 read to avoid with high impendences ranging from 20-22 ohms but do not read oor (> 40,000 ohms).Rep met with patient and hcp at post op appointment today.Hcp feels that site is not infected.Hcp wants to see patient again in two weeks to reveal.Lastly, rep did program around electrodes with high impedance to see if that helps with the sensations of shocking and feeling electricity travel between battery and recharge paddle and vice versa.Also, some symptoms including but not limited to swelling, redness, discharge/wound weeping incision reopening/split open, other were reported by patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
A response was received from a manufacturer representative regarding patient's complaint.Rep reports shocking is a device issue, impedance a device issue and swelling, redness, discharge/wound weeping incision reopening/split open, is a procedural issue.Furthermore, rep states the high impedance and avoid electrodes may contribute to shocking.Also, the swelling, redness, discharge/wound weeping incision reopening/split open contributing factor was surgery for replacement itself.The issue has not been resolved yet, and they eliminated electrodes in programming and will follow up with hcp in 2 weeks about the wound issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from the manufacturer representative reported that the shocking was resolved by reprogramming around the out of range electrodes.The out of range issue remains but there is no plan for surgical intervention unless therapy becomes untherapeutic.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|