• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0500318E
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Apnea (1720); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Loss of consciousness (2418); Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s) (4521)
Event Date 08/16/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On 12/sep/2023 , it was reported to fresenius that this patient with end stage renal disease (esrd) on hemodialysis (hd) utilizing a optiflux 180nre dialyzer for renal replacement therapy (rrt) experienced a hypersensitivity/allergic reaction during treatment.The patient arrived for their regularly scheduled treatment on (b)(6) 2023.The patient¿s pre-treatment vital signs included: blood pressure (b/p) = 182/99, heart rate (hr) = 73 bpm, respiration rate (rr) = 18, temperature = 97.2.The patient¿s hd treatment was started at 11:05 am, however at 11:13 am, the patient became unresponsive (loss of consciousness) and became hypotensive, and experienced body ¿jerking¿ (muscle spasm) and was apneic.The treatment was terminated, and the patient¿s blood was reinfused utilizing normal saline (volume not provided).The patient¿s post-treatment vitals were: b/p = 150/76, hr = 60 bpm, rr = 18, temperature = 97.0.Although the timeline was not provided, it appears the patient regained consciousness prior to the arrival of emergency medical services and was transported to the hospital.The patient reportedly returned to the outpatient dialysis clinic (date not provided) and was treated utilizing a nipro cellentia 17h dialyzer without incident.Additional information was requested however a response was not received.No samples were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Clinical investigation: a temporal relationship exists between hd therapy utilizing the optiflux 180nre dialyzer, and the serious adverse events of a hypersensitivity/allergic reaction, characterized by apnea, hypotension, and loss of consciousness, which required the early termination of treatment and transport to the hospital.The serious adverse events occurred during hd therapy and were remediated by the utilization of an alternative dialyzer (nipro cellentia 17h - alternative sterilant).During hd therapy, blood comes into direct contact with a variety of materials and sterilization methods.Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude some patients may incur a hypersensitivity/allergic reaction while using these products.Additionally, hypersensitivity reactions have been known to occur days, months, or even years after use with the same dialyzer model.Based on the information available, the optiflux 180nre dialyzer cannot be disassociated from the serious adverse events.While no manufacturing defect(s) was reported, the serious adverse events did occur during hd therapy while utilizing the optiflux 180nre dialyzer.Furthermore, given the patient¿s symptoms were indicative of a severe hypersensitivity/allergic reaction, the favorable response to the alternative dialyzer, and no sample available for manufacturer evaluation, the optiflux 180nre dialyzer cannot be excluded from having a possible causal or contributory role in the serious adverse events.The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: a production records review was performed on the reported lot.An investigation of the device history records (dhr) was conducted by the manufacturer.There was no indication of product nonacceptance, deviation, non-conformance, rework, labeling or process control failure during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.The lot met all release criteria.The optiflux dialyzer instruction for use indicates the following: ¿in rare cases, thrombocytopenia or hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions to the dialyzer, or other elements in the extracorporeal circuit, may occur during hemodialysis.Hypersensitivity reactions may cause mild to severe signs and symptoms, including itching, flushing, hives, swelling, fever, leukopenia, hypotension, hypertension, shortness of breath with wheezing, arrhythmias, and/or respiratory arrest.Patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions or patients who have a history of being highly sensitive and allergic to a variety of substances should be carefully monitored during treatment.¿ a definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached with the available information.Therefore, the complaint is not confirmed.
 
Event Description
On 12/sep/2023 it was reported to fresenius that this patient with end stage renal disease (esrd) on hemodialysis (hd) utilizing a optiflux 180nre dialyzer for renal replacement therapy (rrt) experienced a hypersensitivity/allergic reaction during treatment.The patient arrived for their regularly scheduled treatment on (b)(6) 2023.The patient¿s pre-treatment vital signs included: blood pressure (b/p) = 182/99, heart rate (hr) = 73 bpm, respiration rate (rr) = 18, temperature = 97.2.The patient¿s hd treatment was started at 11:05 am, however at 11:13 am the patient became unresponsive (loss of consciousness) and became hypotensive, and experienced body ¿jerking¿ (muscle spasm) and was apneic.The treatment was terminated, and the patient¿s blood was reinfused utilizing normal saline (volume not provided).The patient¿s post-treatment vitals were: b/p = 150/76, hr = 60 bpm, rr = 18, temperature = 97.0.Although the timeline was not provided, it appears the patient regained consciousness prior to the arrival of emergency medical services and was transported to the hospital.The patient reportedly returned to the outpatient dialysis clinic (date not provided) and was treated utilizing a nipro cellentia 17h dialyzer without incident.Additional information was requested however a response was not received.No samples were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
director, site quality
475 west 13th street
ogden UT 84404
Manufacturer (Section G)
OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
director, site quality
475 west 13th street
ogden UT 84404
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key17802504
MDR Text Key324114242
Report Number0001713747-2023-00643
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861100156
UDI-Public00840861100156
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K162488
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Administrator/Supervisor
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/03/2023
Device Catalogue Number0500318E
Device Lot Number23HU03001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Device AgeMO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/12/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/22/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/03/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-