|
Model Number 2404-03 |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/05/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that wire detachment occurred.A comet ii pressure guidewire was being used.During the procedure, it was reported that there was a possibility that excessive torque was applied when crossing the lesion.After obtaining the value in the first measurement for ischemia evaluation of the right coronary artery distal lesion, an attempt was made to perform a measurement for the second time, but there was no signal.During removal, separation occurred approximately 30 cm from the tip.The device was removed from the body along with the microcatheter when it was withdrawn, and no fragments remained inside the patient.The procedure was completed, and no further patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that wire detachment occurred.A comet ii pressure guidewire was being used.During the procedure, it was reported that there was a possibility that excessive torque was applied when crossing the lesion.After obtaining the value in the first measurement for ischemia evaluation of the right coronary artery distal lesion, an attempt was made to perform a measurement for the second time, but there was no signal.During removal, separation occurred approximately 30 cm from the tip.The device was removed from the body along with the microcatheter when it was withdrawn, and no fragments remained inside the patient.The procedure was completed, and no further patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: returned product consisted of an ffr comet pressure wire in two sections.The occ cable was not returned for analysis.The tip, device shaft, proximal face end, and sensor port were microscopically and visually examined for damage, or any irregularities.Inspection of the device revealed that there were numerous kinks throughout the body of the wire.The wire was separated 33cm proximal of the tip, at the second tri-cut.The separated/detached ends appeared to be bent and jagged, with coating peeled away for a length of.5mm on the proximal separated end.The damage to the separated ends indicates that the device was kinked, and pressure/torque was applied prior to separation.The appearance of the confirmed damage was consistent to damage that can be caused from interaction with another device or patient anatomy during the procedure when torquing the device in the lesion.As the device was separated, device to device testing could not be performed, so the sensor port was viewed to verify that the sensor was in the correct location.This sensor was visible and in the correct location within the sensor housing.The wire was gently shaken to see if the sensor would move and be more visible within the sensor housing.The sensor did not move which verified the sensor was not detached from the fiber optic cable.As the sensor was not detached, it was most likely that the kinking then separation caused internal fiber optic damage of the wire, causing the reported signal issue.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|