• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SPYSCOPE DS II ACCESS & DELIVERY CATHETER; CHOLEDOCHOSCOPE AND ACCESSORIES, FLEXIBLE/RIGID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SPYSCOPE DS II ACCESS & DELIVERY CATHETER; CHOLEDOCHOSCOPE AND ACCESSORIES, FLEXIBLE/RIGID Back to Search Results
Model Number M00546610
Device Problems Poor Quality Image (1408); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Optical Problem (3001)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/04/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a spyscope ds ii access & delivery catheter was used in the pancreatic duct during a spyglass procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure, the image from the spyscope ds ii was lost after one and one-half hour of usage while performing lithotripsy.The screen showed a slow visual image with a lot of lines in different colors and then the image was lost.The procedure was not completed due to another spyscope ds ii was unavailable.It was reported that the physician plans to complete the procedure on (b)(6) 2023.Using another spyscope ds ii.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block e1 initial reporter address 1: (b)(6).Block h6 (impact codes): imdrf impact code f1001 is being used to capture the reportable event of aborted/cancelled procedure.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a spyscope ds ii access & delivery catheter was used in the pancreatic duct during a spyglass procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.During the procedure, the image from the spyscope ds ii was lost after one and one-half hour of usage while performing lithotripsy.The screen showed a slow visual image with a lot of lines in different colors and then the image was lost.The procedure was not completed due to another spyscope ds ii was unavailable.It was reported that the physician plans to complete the procedure on (b)(6) 2023 using another spyscope ds ii.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Block e1 initial reporter address 1: (b)(6) block h6 (impact codes): imdrf impact code f1001 is being used to capture the reportable event of aborted/cancelled procedure.Block h10 the returned spyscope ds ii was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that there were elevator marks on the shaft of the catheter.An image assessment for visualization was performed.Upon plugging the device into the controller, a live image was not displayed.Articulation of the catheter working length using the steering wires at the handle had no effect in restoring an image.X-ray imaging of the distal tip showed no problems with the redistribution layer (rdl).X-ray imaging inside the distal cap showed no camera wire damage.X-ray assessment of the pebax region proximal to the distal cap shows damage to the camera wires in the form of a break and potential corrosion.No camera wire damage was observed in the pebax region of the catheter proximal to the working channel sleeve.X-ray imaging of the handle showed no problems with the breakout region or camera wires around the strain relief.X-ray imaging shows no damage to the camera wires at the printed circuit board assembly (pcba).The handle was opened and the electrical components inside were inspected visually.There was no procedural residue seen in the plastic optic fibers (pof).Visual assessment showed no problems with the camera wires in the glue feature.The bond of the glue feature to the pcba was inspected; tweezers were used to wiggle the glue feature.The connection of the camera wires to the pcba was also inspected by slightly lifting the bottom of the glue feature for each of the four camera wires using the tip of the tweezers.No impact to image was seen after these interactions.A leak test was conducted to determine if a leak path into the optics lumen was present based on the reported loss of visualization.The device was pressurized by injecting fluid through the irrigation port of the device while the distal end was inserted into a mock common bile duct (cbd) fixture.Pressure readings were recorded using a pressure gage and the device was pressurized until a reading was displayed on the gage.A drop in pressure was not seen after fluid was injected; a leak was not detected.The distal cap of the catheter was pulled on to reveal the camera wires at the distal end.Visual inspection of the camera wires confirmed the presence of damage in the form of nicked camera wire insulation, break in camera wire conductor and potential corrosion of camera wires.The reported complaint was confirmed.During product analysis, the x-ray assessment of the distal tip noted potential camera wire damage in the form of a fold and potential corrosion.Initial insertion of the device into the controller did not yield a live image.Visual inspection of the camera wire removed from the catheter identified a nick in the insulating wire jacket and damage to the wire conductors.Product analysis results indicate that the most probable problem mode for this device was camera wire damage causing an open circuit in the camera signal.Process controls for the problem mode on the manufacturing line include visual inspection and tooling designed to decrease the chances of wire damage during production.Camera calibration data was able to be obtained during returned product analysis indicating that the camera was properly calibrated and checked for an image, suggesting that the camera wire was intact throughout manufacturing.However, the camera wire is enclosed within the catheter once manufacturing is complete.Therefore, it is likely that assembly process steps such as camera/ pof potting, stuffing, and/ or pof bonding, and subsequent handling of the device, left the camera wire in a vulnerable state, leading to the wire fracture and image problems during field use.Based on all gathered information, the probable cause selected for the visualization problem is quality control deficiency.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SPYSCOPE DS II ACCESS & DELIVERY CATHETER
Type of Device
CHOLEDOCHOSCOPE AND ACCESSORIES, FLEXIBLE/RIGID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
carole morley
300 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834015
MDR Report Key17831275
MDR Text Key324992830
Report Number3005099803-2023-05023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FBN
UDI-Device Identifier08714729965404
UDI-Public08714729965404
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCO
PMA/PMN Number
K183636
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/19/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM00546610
Device Catalogue Number4661
Device Lot Number0032112080
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/28/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/28/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/29/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age34 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-