A customer contacted the ortho clinical diagnostics (ortho) technical solution center (tsc) to report a non-reproducible, lower than expected glucose (glu) result was obtained from a single patient sample processed using vitros chemistry products glu slides lot 0023-3233-9322 on a vitros 5,1 chemistry system.Patient sample result of 35.2 mg/dl vs the expected result of 160.37 mg/dl biased results of the magnitude and direction observed may lead to inappropriate physician action if they were to occur undetected.It is unknown if the lower than expected vitros glu results were reported from the laboratory, however it was confirmed that no treatment was administered based on any lower than expected results obtained.There was no allegation of patient harm as a result of this event.This report corresponds to ortho clinical diagnostics inc (ortho) complaint number (b)(4).And reportability assessment (b)(4).
|
The investigation has determined that a non-reproducible, lower than expected glucose (glu) result was obtained from a single patient sample processed using vitros chemistry products glu slides lot 0023-3233-9322 on a vitros 5,1 chemistry system.The assignable cause of the event could not be determined.Based on historical quality control results, a vitros glu lot 0023-3233-9322 performance issue cannot be fully ruled out as a potential contributor to the event.However, continual tracking and trending of complaint data has not identified any signals to suggest there is a systemic quality issue with vitros glu reagent lot 0023-3233-9322.Although within-run vitros alkp precision testing was not performed to verify the vitros 5,1 system, an issue with the vitros 5,1 chemistry system is not a likely contributor to the event as acceptable vitros glu qc results were obtained between the times the lower than expected patient results were obtained with no service actions performed on the analyzer.It is unknown if the customer is following the collection device manufacturers recommended protocol, therefore it is possible that improper pre-analytical sample processing contributed to the event.It is possible that cellular debris, due to poor sample preparation, was present in the affected sample, although this could not be confirmed.An ortho service engineer reviewed the patient sample runs in e-connectivity and determined that there was no evidence of system failure or metering issues.The pressure profiles for both aspirate and dispense on the slide were not able to be retrieved, therefore a sample mix-up cannot be fully ruled out as a potential contributor to the event.
|