• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V3
Device Problem Microbial Contamination of Device (2303)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/30/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus, during reprocessing, the uretero-reno videoscope tested positive for 11 colony forming units (cfus) of microorganisms revivable at 30 degrees celsius.All channels were sampled.The user did not report any contamination or any other serious deterioration in state of health of any person, to which the scope could have been a contributory cause.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization (cds) was performed by the customer.There was no patient infection.The customer provided the cds process stating that precleaning was performed immediately after the procedure.Water was aspirated through the instrument/suction channel with a suction pump.During manual cleaning, the forceps elevator was not moved to raise and lower 3 times in water during aspiration and was not flushed.Aspiration was done with the first and second position of the suction valve.The air/water and balloon channels were not flushed with water and air.The device passed the leak test.The detergent used was anios.The instrument channel port was brushed.The distal end was not flushed or brushed.The device was rinsed before manual disinfection.The disinfectant used was anioxyde.The channels were flushed and immersed into the disinfectant.The channels were flushed with sterile water.The automated endoscope reprocessor (aer) used was wd440 with wassenburg detergent and wassenburg disinfectant.All channels were connected with tubes when the endoscope was set into the aer.The concentration and expiration date of the disinfectant was controlled.The water quality was filtered, and the filter was replaced periodically in accordance with the instructions for use.The device was dried by wiping with sterile paper and blew with filtered compressed air and stored in a typhoon.Olympus is the maintenance company.After the device was returned to olympus, it was sent out for additional testing.The microbiological analysis report indicated the channels of the scope were cultured and the results obtained comply with the target level for an endoscope subjected to high level disinfection and rinsed with sterile water.This event is under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon receiving additional information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the device evaluation and the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The reprocessing steps provided by the user were reviewed where the following deviation from instructions for use (ifu) was confirmed: brushing was not performed for biopsy channel at manual cleaning.The device was evaluated where no abnormalities were found that could have led to the positive culture.The following defects were noted: bending rubber glue separated, biopsy channel scratched.However, these defects alone are not considered severe enough to cause a potential adverse event.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, a deviation from instructions for use (ifu) was confirmed therefore, reprocessing may have been conducted insufficiently.Growth of microorganisms were found through culture testing by the user after reprocessing.However, when olympus culture tested after reprocessing in accordance with ifu before repair, the results conformed to the regulation's recommendation.The user may be able to prevent the suggested event by handling the device in accordance with the following item in ifu: reprocessing manual_ reprocessing the endoscope_ manually cleaning the endoscope_ brush the channel.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key17860989
MDR Text Key324801255
Report Number9610595-2023-14490
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170435119
UDI-Public04953170435119
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K181451
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V3
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/03/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/27/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/10/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-