• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK VANDERGRIFT INC LEAD EXTRACTION NEEDLE'S EYE FEMORAL SNARE AND WORKSTATION; DXE CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK VANDERGRIFT INC LEAD EXTRACTION NEEDLE'S EYE FEMORAL SNARE AND WORKSTATION; DXE CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LR-NES001
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4453)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
¿blank fields on this form indicated the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.¿ , fill in the common name/product code/510k information if needed (see example below what will be entered ¿ be sure to confirm specific codes to the specific product that is called out within section d: suspect medical device ), ¿this report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable¿ ¿g5 - pma/510(k): k961992.
 
Event Description
Literature - clinical procedural success was achieved in 126 of 131 patients (96.2%).Complete extraction success was achieved in 246 of 267 targeted leads (92.1%).No patient in our series experienced vascular injury, and in particular there was no tear, perforation, or other apparent damage to the superior vena cava.Four patients experienced a total of 5 major complications (table 3).Three patients developed pericardial effusion requiring drainage.Two strokes occurred during or within 24 hours after the procedure.There were no procedural deaths.Minor complications occurred in 11 of 131 patients (8.4%) (table 3).More than half of these minor complications were an increase in the grade of tricuspid regurgitation without the need for immediate intervention.Most frequently, this was a finding reported on the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram without clinical correlation.However, 1 patient required tricuspid valve replacement 5 years after his extraction procedure for right heart failure that could not be adequately managed medically.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.G5 - pma/510(k): k961992.This was a literature complaint and the device was not returned for the complaint; therefore, a physical investigation could not be performed, and the customer's complaint could not be confirmed, other than by the customer's testimony.The complaint/event that was entered and reported within trackwise: "tricuspid regurgitation without need for immediate intervention." per literature, "minor complications occurred in 11 of 131 patients (8.4%) (table 3).More than half of these minor complications were an increase in the grade of tricuspid regurgitation without the need for immediate intervention." the device history record (dhr) was unable to be viewed due to the lot number specific to this complaint was unknown.This complaint mode is being monitored, tracked and trended per the cvi post market surveillance and complaint handling processes.A risk assessment will be performed and documented in the complaint summary tab in trackwise.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Literature - clinical procedural success was achieved in 126 of 131 patients (96.2%).Complete extraction success was achieved in 246 of 267 targeted leads (92.1%).No patient in our series experienced vascular injury, and in particular there was no tear, perforation, or other apparent damage to the superior vena cava.Four patients experienced a total of 5 major complications (table 3).Three patients developed pericardial effusion requiring drainage.Two strokes occurred during or within 24 hours after the procedure.There were no procedural deaths.Minor complications occurred in 11 of 131 patients (8.4%) (table 3).More than half of these minor complications were an increase in the grade of tricuspid regurgitation without the need for immediate intervention.Most frequently, this was a finding reported on the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram without clinical correlation.However, 1 patient required tricuspid valve replacement 5 years after his extraction procedure for right heart failure that could not be adequately managed medically.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD EXTRACTION NEEDLE'S EYE FEMORAL SNARE AND WORKSTATION
Type of Device
DXE CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK VANDERGRIFT INC
1186 montgomery lane
vandergrift PA 15690
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK VANDERGRIFT INC
1186 montgomery lane
vandergrift PA 15690
Manufacturer Contact
timothy vogel
1186 montgomery lane
vandergrift, PA 15690
7248458621
MDR Report Key17864709
MDR Text Key324848351
Report Number2522007-2023-00019
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLR-NES001
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/03/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/18/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-