• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FABIUS GS; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FABIUS GS; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8604700
Device Problem Use of Device Problem (1670)
Patient Problem Emotional Changes (1831)
Event Date 04/19/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the machine failed its self check on the morning of surgery.This was not identified at the time by staff and the patient suffered a hypoxic episode in theatre.Equipment removed and sent to eme for investigation who were unable to detect fault.Draeger notified directly (customer inventory number 137694).Reported to mhra to highlight risk of interchangeability of circuits and visibility of failed self-test alert on draeger anaesthetic machines on (b)(6) it was further reported that following the hypoxic episode and abandonment of the surgery, the patient has gone on to develop post-traumatic symptoms with panic, fear of sleeping, flashbacks and anxiety.She remains under the care of our health psychological team.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Dräger received a user facility report about a case dated back on april 2022, no logfiles were available for the investigation.The analysis includes the provided photos from september 2023, which recreate the displayed message in 2022.The fabius gs was tested after the event without any failure found.Reportedly the fabius gs failed it¿s self check prior to the case in question and posted the message ¿leak compliance test failed ¿ leak >350mls¿.Nevertheless the users decided to put the device into operation and started a case.It was further reported on (b)(6), 2023, that the patient suffered from a hypoxic episode, the surgery was stopped and the patient has subsequently developed post-traumatic symptoms.Due to the missing electronic logfile a detailed reconstruction of the case was not possible.The device was tested after the event without any failures found.None of the available information indicates that a failure of the fabius gs has led to the patient harm.The fabius detected a leak during the regular self-test routine and posted a corresponding message to inform the user.It was the user¿s decision to put the device into operation despite the failed test.Furthermore, it is responsibility of the user to provide monitoring of o2, co2 and agent as described in the fabius gs instructions for use.Such monitoring ensures that restrictions of ventilation are readily apparent to the user.Corresponding alarms would be generated depending on the thresholds adjusted by the user.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FABIUS GS
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
Manufacturer Contact
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
4518822868
MDR Report Key17875738
MDR Text Key324975726
Report Number9611500-2023-00334
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K011404
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8604700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/21/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2005
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-