The commander delivery system was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Without the device returned for evaluation, visual inspection, functional testing and dimensional analysis were unable to be completed.A device history records review did not reveal any issues that could have contributed to the reported events.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint for balloon burst was unable to be confirmed as no device or relevant imagery provided.However, no manufacturing non-conformance was identified during the evaluation.An existing edwards technical summary has been documented for root cause analysis on balloon bursts in a calcified landing zone.The technical summary provides a rationale as to why it is unlikely that a product defect or manufacturing non-conformance contributed to this type of event, including factors on why deployment of balloons on thv delivery systems are subject to increased risk of burst in a calcified landing zone.The complaint description states, 'the balloon rupture during valve deployment due to heavy stj calcium'.The presence of calcification can create a challenging anatomy for balloon inflation.While the balloons are sufficiently designed and tested to ensure the burst pressure is at or above the rated burst pressure, calcified nodules can compromise the structure of the balloon wall via following mechanisms such as puncture, local overstretching, open cell impingement, or stress concentration.During manufacturing, the device undergoes multiple 100% inspections.In addition, the work order underwent functional product verification testing on a sampling basis as a requirement for lot release.These inspections and tests during the manufacturing process support that it is unlikely that a non-conformance contributed to the reported event.In this case, review of available information suggests that patient factors (calcification) contributed to the balloon burst.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.The instructions for use (ifu)/training manuals were reviewed for guidance/instruction involving the commander delivery system usage.Based on the review of the ifu/training manuals, no deficiencies were identified.Therefore, no product risk assessment no corrective or preventative action is required at this time.
|