The following devices were also listed in this report: trident 10° x3 insert 32mm id; cat # 623-10-32e; lot # 8t7lpr.Delta v-40 ceramic head 32/0; cat # 6570-0-132; lot # 86167501.Size 6 accolade ii 132 deg; cat # 6720-0635; lot # 79923107.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.Reported event: an event regarding loosening and infection involving a trident shell was reported.The event was confirmed via clinician review of the provided medical records.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "a revision procedure was performed for a loose acetabular component.The head, shell and liner were revised.The intraoperative specimens showed a staph epi infection.The patient was treated with postoperative antibiotics.No preoperative records, preoperative or intraoperative laboratory results, or post-operative radiographs were provided for review.Only an infection disease note provided postoperatively.Event confirmation: a revision acetabulum and femoral head was performed for a loose trident shell.The hip was found to be infected based on intraoperative specimens.Root cause: the root cause of the revision surgery was a loose acetabular shell.The root cause of the loosening was likely an undiagnosed infection." product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot or sterile lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to loosening of the shell.A review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "a revision procedure was performed for a loose acetabular component.The head, shell and liner were revised.The intraoperative specimens showed a staph epi infection.The patient was treated with postoperative antibiotics.No preoperative records, preoperative or intraoperative laboratory results, or post-operative radiographs were provided for review.Only an infection disease note provided postoperatively.Event confirmation: a revision acetabulum and femoral head was performed for a loose trident shell.The hip was found to be infected based on intraoperative specimens.Root cause: the root cause of the revision surgery was a loose acetabular shell.The root cause of the loosening was likely an undiagnosed infection." microbiological assessment was completed by a stryker microbiologist who indicated the following: "staphylococcus epidermidis have been identified as cause of infection of patient.Staphylococcus epidermidis, coagulase-negative staphylococci, have been considered innocuous commensals of human skin and mucous membranes but are now accepted as the leading opportunistic pathogens responsible for numerous nosocomial infections [1].In particular, they account for 30 to 43% of joint prosthesis infections [2].The current accepted pathophysiological mechanism of s.Epidermidis orthopedic device infection is the direct inoculation of skin colonizing strains at the time of surgery [2][3].Stryker can confirm that the origin of infection cannot have been the implants used for this hip surgery.Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (uhmwpe) plastic hip implants are gamma-irradiated between 25-35kgy for sal 10-6.Metal hip implants are gamma-irradiated between 25-45kgy for sal 10-6.Ceramic hip implants are gamma- irradiated between 25-40kgy for sal 10-6.Uhmwpe plastic x3 hip implants are subjected to overkill sterilisation cycles demonstrating sal 10-6 at half-cycle parameters.Conclusion: due to the nature of the organisms isolated ¿ susceptible to various modes of sterilisation - and the sterilisation methodology employed by stryker, it is not possible that staphylococcus epidermidis could have originated from the implants." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|