|
Catalog Number LXMC14 |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Chest Pain (1776); Discomfort (2330)
|
Event Date 01/01/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/11/2023.B3: only event year known: 2023.D6a: exact implant date is unk.Assumed first day of the month and the first month of the year.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what was the date of implant? when did the symptoms begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com.What is the device lot number? what is the product code? was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a torax linx was implanted 6 years ago.The patient had 1.5t mri (1.5t conditional device) and the patient felt discomfort, like device was "spinning".Afterwards had chest pain, went to er, no cardiac issues.10 days later was seen in the office, esophagram done, showed discontinuity.No removal date yet.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 1/2/2024.Additional information received: received call from dr.(b)(6) regarding patient with discontinuous device that¿s being explanted today ((b)(6)).He provided patient¿s contact information and so i spoke with patient who indicated he had good relief with the device until undergoing multiple mr scans for other health related issues.He was required to have 6 ¿ 7 scans and says the first four scans were fine but as the fifth scan was being started he experienced severe stabbing and burning pain and he ¿could feel a pulling sensation.¿ he had pain for several days before it subsided.Shortly after this, he underwent imaging with dr.(b)(6) and the device was found to be discontinuous.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/9/2024.Investigation summary: a linx device with a visible weld ball that disconnected from a washer was returned to the analysis site.The link length and tensile force measurements were found to meet the applicable specifications during device analysis.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the visible weld ball, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure, tooling marks were noted in some beads.The device was scanned using computer tomography (ct), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.The washer through-hole at the separation was measured and was greater than the specification.The washer through-hole was concentric with material displacement at the outer edge of the through hole.The overall appearance of the surface of the washer through hole didn¿t exhibit gross loss of shape.The top view of the diameter of the exposed weld ball was measured.This diameter is within the specification.The weld ball was concentric with the respect to the wire.The device lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|