• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL EVERA MRI XT DR SURESCAN; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL EVERA MRI XT DR SURESCAN; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number DDMB1D4
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Electromagnetic Interference (1194); High impedance (1291); Over-Sensing (1438); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919); Impedance Problem (2950)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/14/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that post operatively the right atrial (ra) lead exhibited oversensing.Approximately one month after implant the ra lead exhibited undefined high impedance.It was noted that the lead had been inactivated, however it was later reported that the lead had been revised due to a suspected connection issue.After the lead revision noise was still visible when the patient moved and took deep respirations.The physician continued to monitor the lead at that time.It was further reported that a few weeks post revision atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (at/af) episodes continued to show nonphysiologic noise.The physician suspected a ¿bandpass filter¿ issue with the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (icd).Episodes were reviewed by qualified technical personnel who indicated that the noise and variable impedance measurements were consistent with lead fracture.The ra lead and icd remain in use.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product event summary: the device was not returned for analysis, however, performance data collected from the device was received and analyzed.Analysis of the device memory indicated the impedance of the atrial pacing lead was beyond the expected upper range.Analysis of the device memory indicated the impedance trend of the atrial pacing lead was variable.Analysis of the device memory indicated noise.Analysis of the device memory indicated atrial oversensing.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was further reported that the right atrial (ra) lead was explanted and replaced.After the lead replacement oversensing suspected to be due to electromagnetic interference was observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h6 for removal of a1702 annex a code.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVERA MRI XT DR SURESCAN
Type of Device
DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL
route du molliau 31
case postale
tolochenaz vaud 1131
SZ  1131
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL
route du molliau 31
case postale
tolochenaz vaud 1131
SZ   1131
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key17949478
MDR Text Key325840079
Report Number9614453-2023-03714
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier00763000059491
UDI-Public00763000059491
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P980016
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberDDMB1D4
Device Catalogue NumberDDMB1D4
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/20/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/17/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/17/2023
12/02/2023
12/27/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/20/2023
12/13/2023
12/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/20/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
5076-52 LEAD, 6935M62 LEAD
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight78 KG
-
-