Correction b2, h6 health impact, results, conclusion.The complaint could be confirmed, since the information for evaluation matches the alleged failure.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals the following was observed: the tibial component seems to be chosen a little bit too small and is clearly lateralized and out of the tibial shaft orientation, implanted in a varic orientation.The component is intact; however, the tibial component is positioned poorly not allowing to withstand the persisting load of an ankle joint.Therefore, revision is considered.Infection cannot be assessed with ct scan only.There is no information given, that an infection is present, here.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the lot number was not communicated.Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to a user related issue.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|