H10: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.An engineering evaluation is not required because there is no allegation of a malfunction which could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance; no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no use-related issue with a hazardous situation; no device-related infection; and there is no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.Ifu review unable to be performed as no details regarding a failure mode of the device were provided.No details regarding what issue caused the device to be explanted.For products not returned, an engineering evaluation may be triggered if there is an allegation of a device malfunction that could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance.Although the product was not returned and there is an allegation that the event was due to a deficiency in the original device, there is no information available to suggest the allegation is related to a manufacturing non-conformance or a product failure (with regard to design, reliability, or use error) with a moderate, major, or critical severity.Thus, a full engineering evaluation will not be performed.A capa/scar/pra is not required as there are no confirmed product or labeling nonconformances and no other triggers are met.Based on the information available, a definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined.
|