Visual and functional inspections were not performed due to the implant fixation screw not being available for inspection.A dhr review was not performed due to manufacturing records not being available to review as part of the complaint investigation.The risk analysis fmea was reviewed which included "broken or damaged screw or sleeve during implantation", with "misalignment of screw ans [sic] sleeve during tightening" as a potential cause of hazard.The risk was mitigated by designing a special lateral screw inserter, and the risk/benefit ratio was recorded as "remaining risk is acceptable when weighted against the benefits." it may be possible for a system fixation screw to break if excessive rotational force was applied while tightening, or if there was misalignment of the screw and sleeve during tightening.It could be possible to apply excessive rotational force to the system fixation screw if the screw and sleeve were rotated beyond what is required to secure the implant in its final location.Misalignment of the screw and sleeve could allow for cross-threading when engaged and tightened.A cross-threaded screw and sleeve may seize, and additional force applied may result in the reported implant malfunction.Correct alignment of the screw and sleeve of the fixation screw must be achieved for appropriate engagement.A special lateral screw inserter was designed to aid in appropriate alignment of the screw and sleeve prior to engagement and rotation.The root cause of this complaint cannot be reliably determined.There have not been any other complaints of similar nature in the past 12 months.The manufacturer will continue to monitor this product family for complaints from the field.
|