• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US ARTHRO GRASPER PEN 35 UP *EA; ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US ARTHRO GRASPER PEN 35 UP *EA; ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 214601
Device Problem Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/12/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the sales rep that during an unspecified surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2023 the arthro grasper pen 35 up device up jaw was not closing properly.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There was no delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received.Upon visual inspection, the device was found to be worn.When the trigger was actuated to test for its functionality, the upper jaw doesn¿t open completely contributing to the holding issue; therefore, this complaint can be confirmed.The tip appeared to be slightly deformed causing that the jaw and teeth did not align properly.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.The lot number provided indicates this device is two years old and has seen considerable use in the field which is consistent with its appearance.This failure can be attributed to the wear or damaged from heavily handling.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
ACCESSORIES, ARTHROSCOPIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raymham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key17977212
MDR Text Key326173874
Report Number1221934-2023-03819
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NBH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705003846
UDI-Public10886705003846
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number214601
Device Lot Number21E01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/12/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/20/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/09/2023
12/05/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/15/2023
12/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2021
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-