BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Lot Number VMFD290523 |
Device Problem
Defective Device (2588)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/15/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a watchman left atrial appendage closure (laac) procedure, a versacross connect kit was selected for use.Before the transseptal puncture, when the versacross dilator and watchman double curve sheath were prepared to advanced to atrial septum, the dilator hub broke off.Hence, both the sheath and dilator were removed and a new kit was opened.The transseptal puncture was performed successfully with the second kit.The procedure was completed successfully and no patient complications occurred.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.It was further confirmed no damages were noted to the dilator prior to removing it from the packaging or to the packaging itself.No unusual force applied.No fragments or separated pieces noted.The wire was inside the dilator at the time it snapped.The sheath was not found to be damaged or caused the dilator damage.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a watchman left atrial appendage closure (laac) procedure, a versacross connect kit was selected for use.Before the transseptal puncture, when the versacross dilator and watchman double curve sheath were prepared to advanced to atrial septum, the dilator hub broke off.Hence, both the sheath and dilator were removed and a new kit was opened.The transseptal puncture was performed successfully with the second kit.The procedure was completed successfully and no patient complications occurred.The device is expected to be returned for analysis.It was further confirmed no damages were noted to the dilator prior to removing it from the packaging or to the packaging itself.No unusual force applied.No fragments or separated pieces noted.The wire was inside the dilator at the time it snapped.The sheath was not found to be damaged or caused the dilator damage.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Supplemental report being submitted for the product analysis results.Bsc aware date is 02jan2024.A visual inspect found that there is a clean fracture of the hypotube, about 1 mm proximal to the proximal-end of the extrusion.Tip damage is confirmed to be due to the decontamination process and is not attributed to the complaint.No other issues noted: hypotube cross section has maintained ovality (i.E.No kinking) and there are no stress marks on the extrusion.Proximal end of device (i.E.Hub) was not returned for inspection.Evidence does not suggest that the hypotube fractured due to a kink.Reproducing the failure shows possibility of clean fracture is possible if the hypotube is damaged during manufacturing.This can take place during roll-cutting the extrusion.A weak local region on the hypotube, created by a sharp blade, would result in a clean fracture when torque/prying force is applied during the procedure.The difference in hypotube and extrusion length suggests that re-work was done to increase the hypotube protrusion length, after proximal trimming.Analysis of the returned product confirmed the dilator damage and the reported complaint.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|