The device was returned to zoll medical canada for evaluation and the device performed to specification.A review of the clinical log file showed two no shock advised events.The first analysis had two segments, both of which there were invalid values for rate, rate variability, maximum and average amplitude within the segment.They were determined to be not shockable due to the difficulties the program had with these measurements.Analysis three also resulted in no shock advised.Segment one was determined shockable, however, the other two segments were not shockable rhythms therefore it resulted in an overall no shock advised prompt.The device was recertified and returned to the customer.Analysis of reports of this type has not identified an increase in trend.
|