It was reported the pressurewire x, (pwx), wireless was calibrated and equalized successfully.The device was to be used in the left anterior descending (lad) lesion.It was noted a <6f sheath was used against instruction for use.A drug-eluting stent (des) was previously implanted in the lad and left circumflex (lcx) lesions.There was difficulty advancing the pwx due to the vessel angulation in the lcx, and the pwx slightly kinked.When the pwx was pulled, it got stuck and could not be removed.A 6f guiding catheter and non-abbott micro catheter were used to try to remove the pwx, however, removal was still unsuccessful.When the pwx was pulled with the non-abbott catheter, the pwx separated in the aorta.The separated segment was attempted to be snared, however, ischemia got stronger.The blood flow was nearly cut off and timi was 0 or 1 at the location in which the pwx was stuck.A balloon was used multiple times to restore blood flow, however, blood flow was not completely recovered.The guiding catheter was changed to a 7f and a snare device was used in an attempt to retrieve the separated segment of the pwx into the guiding catheter, however, removal was still unsuccessful.A cutting balloon was used to cut the remaining segment of the pwx in the aorta from the left main trunk (lmt).Approximately 15cm from the tip remains free floating in the anatomy.The procedure was completed with intravascular ultrasound and a drug coated balloon.It is the physicians opinion, that the pwx got stuck with the previously implanted des in the lcx lesion.The patient was re-hospitalized and percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in the lad at a later date.No additional information was provided.
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported event of material separation was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot specific product quality issues.The investigation determined that the reported material separation resulting in foreign body in patient and ischemia were likely related to procedural circumstances.It is likely that inadvertent damage such as bend/kink occurred due to challenging anatomical conditions (vessel angulation, calcification, etc); as a result, it reduced the maneuverability of the pressurewire and caused difficulty in advancing.It is likely that the distal tip got caught or entangled with the previously implanted stent which likely caused difficulty in removing.It was reported that a non-abbott catheter was used to retrieve the pressurewire, and it was noted during analysis that the non-abbott catheter was torn.The braiding of the non-abbott catheter tightly wrapped the distal tube of pressurewire.It is likely the braiding strangled the pressurewire resulting in the reported separation during the attempted removal.The medical intervention and prolonged hospitalization appear to be related to the circumstances of the procedure.Information from the field stated that the pressurewire was used with a guiding catheter smaller than 6f.The pressurewire instructions for use (ifu), directs the user to use the pressurewire guidewire in conjunction with a 6f (2 mm diameter) guiding catheter.In this case, it could not be determined if using a smaller-sized guiding catheter caused or contributed to the reported difficulties.The reported patient effect of vessel occlusion (ischemia) is listed in the pressurewire x ifu as known potential complications which may be encountered during the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|