|
Model Number 380652-35 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 07/06/2023 |
Event Type
Death
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The hospital risk manager reported that they do not yet have any additional information available, and that there were no issues with an intuitive surgical product.A review of the site history logs for the instruments used during the probable reported procedure found that the following multiple use instruments have been used in subsequent procedures with no reported complaints: endoscope, monopolar curved scissors, prograsp forceps, mega needle driver.Two additional multiple use prograsp forceps with remaining lives have not yet been used again, and have no complaints reported.The vessel sealer extend that was used during the procedure is a single use device.Review of advanced energy logs show that the vessel sealer extend was installed and passed homing 3 times.There were 69 cut complete events with no errors.In addition, there was a cut failure, jammed blade and several open jaw angles due to blade exposure events recorded.A system log review did not reveal any system errors that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.A review of the logs for the 5 subsequent procedures performed with this system also did not show any errors that would cause or contribute to any related events.A device history record review for the device(s) used during the procedure showed no non-conformances were identified.A review of the event was performed by an intuitive surgical, inc.(isi) medical safety officer (mso) who concluded that based on the limited information provided in the summary of events, and the unknown circumstances around this patient¿s death, insufficient information exists to determine if any intuitive surgical instruments or products contributed to this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
As part of a litigation hold notice received from the site regarding a da vinci assisted hysterectomy, it was reported the patient expired.During follow-up, the hospital risk manager stated that they have not yet received the lawsuit, and therefore, they do not know what the plaintiff is alleging.At the site, there were no reports of issues with an intuitive surgical, inc.(isi) product or any human error associated with the procedure.The patient expired on the date of the procedure, while being transferred to the icu.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|