• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC. VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION; DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
Event Date 10/04/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman procedure.A vessel perforation and pericardial effusion were noted.During the transeptal crossing, the versacross rf wire grazed along the outer wall of the aorta, and it was believed that a small perforation occurred.However, the procedure continued, and the watchman device was implanted with no issues.The perforation self-sealed during procedure after several minutes, a hematoma was noted on outer wall of aorta and small pericardial effusion on the pericardial sack was noted as well (size.5).The patients' vitals were stable, no further intervention was needed, and the patient fully recovered.The patient was not admitted to hospital beyond standard care.The procedure was completed.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).The patient was not on warfarin nor on antiplatelet drugs at this point.The patient was expected to be discharged (b)(6) 2023 (current status is unknown).A transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) was used to confirm perforation.The patient has lipomatous septum with small window.The transseptal puncture was completed prior to noticing the pe and radio frequency was only applied once.No reason to believe that the versacross devices malfunctioned during the procedure.The act therapeutic during the procedure was at 371 and at 300 after the procedure.In the physician's opinion, the device contributes to the patient complications, since when crossing the septum, the rf versacross wire made contact with the aortic wall when crossing into the left atrium, which could cause a small perforation on the outer wall of the aorta.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation; however, a media was provided.Thus, a supplemental mdr to report will be filed (mdr aware date (b)(6)2023).The complaint is confirmed by the media provided in the complaint (pre-procedure and post-procedure aortic puncture).The cause is not determined as the device has not been returned to bsc for analysis.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a versacross connect access solution was selected for use during a watchman procedure.A vessel perforation and pericardial effusion were noted.During the transeptal crossing, the versacross rf wire grazed along the outer wall of the aorta, and it was believed that a small perforation occurred.However, the procedure continued, and the watchman device was implanted with no issues.The perforation self-sealed during procedure after several minutes, a hematoma was noted on outer wall of aorta and small pericardial effusion on the pericardial sack was noted as well (size.5).The patients' vitals were stable, no further intervention was needed, and the patient fully recovered.The patient was not admitted to hospital beyond standard care.The procedure was completed.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).The patient was not on warfarin nor on antiplatelet drugs at this point.The patient was expected to be discharged 10/06/2023 (current status is unknown).A transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) was used to confirm perforation.The patient has lipomatous septum with small window.The transseptal puncture was completed prior to noticing the pe and radio frequency was only applied once.No reason to believe that the versacross devices malfunctioned during the procedure.The act therapeutic during the procedure was at 371 and at 300 after the procedure.In the physician's opinion, the device contributes to the patient complications, since when crossing the septum, the rf versacross wire made contact with the aortic wall when crossing into the left atrium, which could cause a small perforation on the outer wall of the aorta.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERSACROSS CONNECT LAAC ACCESS SOLUTION
Type of Device
DILATOR, VESSEL, FOR PERCUTANEOUS CATHETERIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5959 trans-canada highway
montreal H4T 1 A1
CA  H4T 1A1
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYLIS MEDICAL COMPANY INC.
5825 explorer drive
mississauga, on L4W 5 P6
CA   L4W 5P6
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
dc a330
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key18048873
MDR Text Key327086831
Report Number2124215-2023-60345
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRE
UDI-Device Identifier00685447012597
UDI-Public00685447012597
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K220414
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/19/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/01/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/12/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/19/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age83 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-