• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARDEX® ALL-SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233 BARDEX® ALL-SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 165816
Device Problem Deflation Problem (1149)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 08/21/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the blocked bladder catheter was identified by the nurse as there was no urine in the bag.The nurse wanted to change the foley catheter, but deflated the balloon and was unable to remove the catheter, which seemed to be stuck over the last 2 centimetres.They called the doctor on duty, who had to sedate the patient in order to pull on the catheter forcefully to remove it.The clinical consequences of the event was that the patient had to be sedated for the procedure, pain for the patient and increased risk of infection following removal and reinsertion of the catheter.Per follow-up information received from ibc on 19oct2023, stated that the patient was discharged from the hospital and was doing better.The patient had to be sedated in order to be de-weighted and then re-weighted, as they were suffering from severe pain.There was no notion of urinary infection following the incident, but the patient was already under antibiotic therapy (claforan and flagyl) during their hospitalization (systemic inflammatory syndrome in a context of pancreatitis with episodes of desaturation).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event was inconclusive because no sample was returned.A potential root cause for this failure could be due to "incorrect balloon design (balloon wall thickness excessive)".A review of the device history record did not show any problems or conditions that would have contributed to the reported issue.The instructions for use were found adequate and state the following: "sterile: unless package is opened or damaged.Warning: do not use ointments or lubricants having a petrolatum base.They will damage silicone and may cause balloon to burst.Caution: do not aspirate urine through drainage funnel wall.Visually inspect the product for any imperfections or surface deterioration prior to use.To deflate catheter balloon: gently insert a syringe in the catheter valve.Never use more force than is required to make the syringe ¿stick¿ in the valve.If you notice slow or no deflation, re-seat the syringe gently.Allow the balloon to deflate slowly on its own.Do not aspirate or manually accelerate the deflation of the balloon.If permitted by hospital protocol, the valve arm may be severed.If this fails, contact adequately trained professional for assistance, as directed by hospital protocol." h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: the device was not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the blocked bladder catheter was identified by the nurse as there was no urine in the bag.The nurse wanted to change the foley catheter, but deflated the balloon and was unable to remove the catheter, which seemed to be stuck over the last 2 centimetres.They called the doctor on duty, who had to sedate the patient in order to pull on the catheter forcefully to remove it.The clinical consequences of the event was that the patient had to be sedated for the procedure, pain for the patient and increased risk of infection following removal and reinsertion of the catheter.Per follow-up information received from ibc on 19oct2023, stated that the patient was discharged from the hospital and was doing better.The patient had to be sedated in order to be de-weighted and then re-weighted, as they were suffering from severe pain.There was no notion of urinary infection following the incident, but the patient was already under antibiotic therapy (claforan and flagyl) during their hospitalization (systemic inflammatory syndrome in a context of pancreatitis with episodes of desaturation).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BARDEX® ALL-SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER
Type of Device
FOLEY CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD INC. (COVINGTON) -1018233
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
Manufacturer Contact
xeeroy rada
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key18055473
MDR Text Key327162382
Report Number1018233-2023-07789
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K040504
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number165816
Device Lot NumberNGGX1308
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/10/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/02/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/27/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/08/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-