• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COLOPLAST A/S PERCUTANEOUS PUNCTURE NEEDLE; NEPHROSTOMY CATHETER INTRODUCTION NEEDLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COLOPLAST A/S PERCUTANEOUS PUNCTURE NEEDLE; NEPHROSTOMY CATHETER INTRODUCTION NEEDLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RAC018
Device Problems Accessory Incompatible (1004); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to the available information when the other company's guide wire passed through the device the tip of the wire sheared off and is thought to remain in the patient's kidney.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No lot number and no sample were available, so no documentary or sample investigation could be made.Furthermore, with additional information received we can define that the guidewire used with chiba needle was a zipwire¿ hydrophilic guidewire from boston scientific.According to the prescriptive information found in boston site these two medical devices were not compatible.On the boston document it was stated: "do not manipulate, advance and/or withdraw the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire through a metal cannula or needle.Manipulation, advancement and/or withdrawal through a metal device may result in destruction and/or separation of the outer polymer jacket requiring retrieval.If a needle is used for initial placement, a plastic entry needle is recommended when using the zipwire hydrophilic guidewire.Extreme caution should be observed when used with a one-wall puncture style needle." the damage observed on the guide wire was due to the incompatibility of this kind of guide wire with our chiba needle.A similar case study based on the item number rac018, over last four years identified no similar cases.A risk management framework evaluation was performed and concluded that residual risks are adequately controlled and reduced as far as possible, and the residual risks associated with the use of the product are acceptable when weighed against the benefits to the patient/user.A clinical assessment was performed and concluded that the incident of boston sc.Zipwire hydrophilic guidewire rupture at the tip is related to the use through a puncture needle instead of a ureteroscope.Therefore, such incident is considered as not related to the chiba needle.
 
Event Description
The separated portion was removed along with other stone fragments in a left rigid/flexible ureteroscopy with laser stone treatment, stone basketing, retrograde pyleogram and ureteric stent insertion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCUTANEOUS PUNCTURE NEEDLE
Type of Device
NEPHROSTOMY CATHETER INTRODUCTION NEEDLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COLOPLAST A/S
1 holtedam humlebaek, dk 3050
humlebaek 3050
DA  3050
Manufacturer (Section G)
CMF-SARLAT
9 avenue edmond rostand
sarlat-la-caneda
FR  
Manufacturer Contact
usbes brian schmidt
1601 west river road n
minneapolis, MN 55411
MDR Report Key18056090
MDR Text Key327178005
Report Number9610711-2023-00239
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GBO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRAC018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received11/02/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-