BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION REZUM; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Urinary Retention (2119); Hematuria (2558); Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem (4503)
|
Event Date 02/01/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific via an article published in journal of endourology that a prospective study was conducted to compare the sexual and urinary outcomes of water vapor intraprostatic injection in patients satisfying inclusion criteria of the randomized controlled trial (rct) with unselected patients.All patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph) who underwent water vapor therapy at eight institutions were followed and analyzed the functional results.Patients were divided in two groups: patients who matched the 5-year rct inclusion criteria (group a) and patients who did not (group b).The pre- and postoperative data, complications, presence of antegrade ejaculation, and urinary and sexual outcomes were periodically recorded.A total of 426 patients were eligible for the study (232 in group a and 194 in group b).Patients in group b had a higher american society of anesthesiologists score, prostate volume, and postvoid residual measurement.No difference was found in terms of preoperative international prostate symptom score, international index of erectile function, maximum urinary flow, and prostate-specific antigen.Longer operative time and higher number of vapor injections were required in group b, with no differences in hospital stay, injection density, and complication rates.All the urinary and sexual outcomes improved with no differences between the two groups.The reintervention rate at the latest follow-up visit was 2.6% in group a and 3.1% in group b.The overall complication rate between the groups was similar (31% vs 26.2%).Reported complications were clot retention, acute urinary retention (aur), hematuria, lower urinary tract symptoms (luts) and groin pain, resulting in blood transfusion, bladder irrigation and catheterization.Water vapor intraprostatic injections showed a safe and effective profile regardless of the prostate size, presence of indwelling catheter, antiplatelet/anticoagulant medications, and patients comorbidities.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There was no device available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported patient symptoms are a known risk associated with implant of these devices as indicated in the instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device was assigned to this investigation.Cindolo, l., campobasso, d., conti, e., uricchio, f., franzoso, f., maruzzi, d., viola, l., varvello, f., balsamo, r., ferrari, g., morselli, s., & siena, g.(2023).Do patients treated with water vapor therapy and meeting randomized clinical trial criteria have better urinary and sexual outcomes than an unselected cohort?.Journal of endourology, 37(3), 323-329.Https://doi.Org/10.1089/end.2022.0637.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|