• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX23
Device Problem Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem Unspecified Vascular Problem (4441)
Event Date 09/07/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported by an edwards europe affiliate, during a transfemoral tavr procedure with a 23mm sapien 3 ultra valve, the commander delivery system and valve got stuck 5-6 cm after insertion through the esheath, and one of the valve struts was observed to be bent.It was decided to remove the delivery system and valve through the esheath.After the withdrawal, a tear in the esheath that was noted.A new 23mm sapien 3 ultra valve was prepped, inserted, and implanted successfully.Per report, the patient had a vascular problem related to vascular access.During vascular femoral closure, the artery was occluded as the anchor got stuck in the dissection, possibly caused by the esheath tear.The team used a balloon dilator to solve the issue, but the symptoms of lower limb ischemia persisted.Vascular intervention was performed.The patient final outcome was good and the patient was discharged.Per report, the perceived root cause of this event was probably due to a 'technical issue' with the inner layer of esheath.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.The returned device was visually examined for any abnormalities, and the following was observed: four struts bent outwards on the inflow side.One strut bent sideways at the outflow side.The valve frame was distorted and canted.The valve was deployed by engineering and one strut remains bent.Post procedural images were provided, and the following was observed: as reported, 'esheath was cut by physician for exploration what happened with valve.' the strain relief is cut off and the crimped valve is exposed through the torn sheath liner, with a valve strut bent outwards at the inflow side.A lot history review was performed and revealed no other complaints relating to the reported event were identified.The instructions for use/training manuals were reviewed for guidance/instruction involving the devices.Based on the review of the ifu/training manuals, no deficiencies were identified.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint for frame damage was confirmed based on provided imagery and returned device.As reported, 'the commander ds with the valve got stuck 5 - 6cm after insertion through esheath.Moreover, one of the valve struts was bent while advancing.All the system was removed through esheath.' follow up information stated that the patient's access vessels were mildly tortuous and calcified.Per training manual, 'push force can vary due to angle of insertion, vessel diameter, tortuosity and degree of calcification.' calcification can reduce the vessel diameter and may increase restriction leading to resistance.Calcification and tortuosity can result in the creation of sub optimal angles during delivery system insertion that may lead to resistance.Excessive device manipulation and/or high push and pull force can lead to the valve struts interacting with the sheath shaft and resulted the strut damage at the valve outflow side.Based on available information, investigation suggests that patient factors (calcification, tortuosity) and/or procedural factors (excessive device manipulation) may have contributed to the reported event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18068891
MDR Text Key327353135
Report Number2015691-2023-17273
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750TFX23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/07/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/03/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/05/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/15/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-