• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72SDKIT
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/08/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that this complaint was submitted to the fda by the user facility with the following reference number mw5147030: the device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a sendit delivery device (sendit), a neuron 6f 088 long sheath, and a microwire.During the procedure, the physician advanced the red72 with the sendit over the guidewire up to the ica and into the mca.The physician removed the sendit and performed one pass using the red72.After completion of the pass, a contrast run revealed small residual flow with narrowing in the mca.The physician then advanced the red72 and noticed that the red72 would not advance forward.While removing the red72, the physician experienced resistance and noticed that the red72 fractured at two locations near the distal part within the neuron max.The fractured pieces of the red72 were contained within the neuron max.A snare device was used to remove the fractured pieces of the red72 within the neuron max.The procedure was completed using a penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68), the same neuron max, and the same microwire.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed a fracture on the distal shaft.Evaluation revealed a kink distal to the fractured location.This indicates that the red72 may have become pinned during advancement.This likely contributed to the reported resistance experienced during retraction.If the red72 is retracted against resistance, the device may become stretched and subsequently fracture.Further evaluation of the device revealed an ovalization on the distal shaft.This damage was incidental to the complaint and the root cause of this could not be determined.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18070086
MDR Text Key327730726
Report Number3005168196-2023-00494
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948025943
UDI-Public815948025943
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211654
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED72SDKIT
Device Lot NumberF00008137
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/09/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/03/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/03/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/23/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-