Model Number IPN923885 |
Device Problem
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/18/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Qn# (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that "during intubation we observed that the blade was not stable (it was difficult to intubate when it should have been an straight forward intubation) with low visibility, the lighting was low.No clinical consequences for the patient.I managed to insert the et tube but it was a patient with no problems with ventilations and easy to intubate.Because of the low lighting source and blade instability, a procedure that should have been easy ended up being more complex that it should".No patient harm or injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that "during intubation we observed that the blade was not stable (it was difficult to intubate when it should have been an straight forward intubation) with low visibility, the lighting was low.No clinical consequences for the patient.I managed to insert the et tube but it was a patient with no problems with ventilations and easy to intubate.Because of the low lighting source and blade instability, a procedure that should have been easy ended up being more complex that it should".No patient harm or injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4), the complaint sample was returned to the manufacturing site.They reported, "the customer returned one blade of rusch greenlite mac 4 that belongs to old design for investigation.Visual inspection could not be performed as returned complaint device is for old design blade whereas customer reported the complaint for new designed blade.The device history record review for lot code: 230422341 per complaint notification summary was reviewed and no issue that could have contributed to the reported failure was noted.The device was manufactured according to release specification.The devices were tested for 100% functional testing prior to ship to customer.The root cause of the complaint is deemed to be "undetermined/unknown" because there is no actual complaint device returned for physical investigation.Corrective action is not required at this time as the root cause of this complaint is deemed unknown/undetermined as actual complaint device is not available or returned to determine the actual root cause.In the event if complaint device will be made available for physical investigation, then this complaint file will be re-opened to document the actual findings based on the physical investigation." teleflex will continue to monitor and trend for reports of this nature.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|