• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II RING; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II RING; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 5200M
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451)
Event Date 09/12/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was learned from the implant patient registry that a 34mm mitral ring was explanted and replaced with a 30mm mitral ring after an implant duration of 1 year, 9 months due to regurgitation.The perceived root cause of the event is due to structural deficiency/damage of the annuloplasty ring.The patient was stable in the icu post procedure.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint." the information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
There is evidence of device-related harm or structural deficiency of the ring that could cause or contribute to a serious injury.The device was not returned for evaluation, as device request is still ongoing.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The most likely cause is patient factors, including progression of the patients valvular disease.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and showed that this device met all manufacturing and sterilization specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO II RING
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
one edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key18088082
MDR Text Key327566466
Report Number2015691-2023-17309
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
UDI-Device Identifier00690103180220
UDI-Public(01)00690103180220(17)261012
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K083470
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number5200M
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/13/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/07/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/04/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/13/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-