As reported by a field clinical specialist (fcs), during the procedure of a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve in the aortic position via transfemoral approach.Lots of torque in the delivery system were noted, and there was difficult to inflate and deflate the valve.The pacing run was a bit longer than usual, however the patient was stable the entire time and was in stable condition after valve deployment.
|
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for correction and additional information.The following sections of this report have been updated: corrected h.6 device code and investigation conclusions and investigation findings.Added new information to h.6 type of investigation.H.6 investigation findings: blockage identified the device was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Without the device returned for evaluation, visual inspection, functional testing and dimensional analysis were unable to be completed.Imagery was not provided for review.A review of the risk management documentation was performed, and no evidence of product non-conformances or labeling/ifu inadequacies were identified in the evaluation.The complaint was unable to be confirmed as no device and procedural imagery were provided for evaluation.As the device was not returned, engineering was unable to perform any visual examination, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Therefore, the presence of a manufacturing non-conformance was unable to be determined.However, review of the dhr and lot history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint event.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Furthermore, no abnormalities were reported during device unpacking or preparation.As reported by a field clinical specialist (fcs), during the procedure of a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve in the aortic position via transfemoral approach.Lots of torque in the delivery system were noted, and there was difficult to inflate and deflate the valve.The pacing run was a bit longer than usual, however the patient was stable the entire time and was in stable condition after valve deployment.Additional information received states that the approximate time of inflation/deflation was ''about 35 seconds to inflate and 35 seconds to deflate''.Patient factors such as tortuosity can contribute to the reported event by presenting challenging pathways and constricting the passageway for the delivery system and may contribute to inflation difficulties.It is possible that during manipulation performed to overcome difficulty positioning the valve within the native valve, the delivery system balloon catheter became temporarily kinked/twisted.A kink can obstruct the inflation fluid pathway, potentially leading to the reported slow inflation/deflation times.As no inflation/deflation issues were reported during device preparation or post-implantation on the back table, it is unlikely that a manufacturing nonconformance contributed to the reported complaint event.As such, available information suggests that patient (tortuosity) and procedural factors (temporarily kinking/twisting of delivery system due to excessive manipulation) may have contributed to the reported event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No ifu/labeling/training manual inadequacies were identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative action nor product risk assessment is required at this time.
|