• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750CM26A
Device Problems Inflation Problem (1310); Failure to Align (2522); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/18/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.H3 other text : the device is not returning.
 
Event Description
As reported by a field clinical specialist (fcs), during the procedure of a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve in the aortic position via transfemoral approach.Lots of torque in the delivery system were noted, and there was difficult to inflate and deflate the valve.The pacing run was a bit longer than usual, however the patient was stable the entire time and was in stable condition after valve deployment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for correction and additional information.The following sections of this report have been updated: corrected h.6 device code and investigation conclusions and investigation findings.Added new information to h.6 type of investigation.H.6 investigation findings: blockage identified the device was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.Without the device returned for evaluation, visual inspection, functional testing and dimensional analysis were unable to be completed.Imagery was not provided for review.A review of the risk management documentation was performed, and no evidence of product non-conformances or labeling/ifu inadequacies were identified in the evaluation.The complaint was unable to be confirmed as no device and procedural imagery were provided for evaluation.As the device was not returned, engineering was unable to perform any visual examination, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Therefore, the presence of a manufacturing non-conformance was unable to be determined.However, review of the dhr and lot history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint event.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Furthermore, no abnormalities were reported during device unpacking or preparation.As reported by a field clinical specialist (fcs), during the procedure of a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra resilia valve in the aortic position via transfemoral approach.Lots of torque in the delivery system were noted, and there was difficult to inflate and deflate the valve.The pacing run was a bit longer than usual, however the patient was stable the entire time and was in stable condition after valve deployment.Additional information received states that the approximate time of inflation/deflation was ''about 35 seconds to inflate and 35 seconds to deflate''.Patient factors such as tortuosity can contribute to the reported event by presenting challenging pathways and constricting the passageway for the delivery system and may contribute to inflation difficulties.It is possible that during manipulation performed to overcome difficulty positioning the valve within the native valve, the delivery system balloon catheter became temporarily kinked/twisted.A kink can obstruct the inflation fluid pathway, potentially leading to the reported slow inflation/deflation times.As no inflation/deflation issues were reported during device preparation or post-implantation on the back table, it is unlikely that a manufacturing nonconformance contributed to the reported complaint event.As such, available information suggests that patient (tortuosity) and procedural factors (temporarily kinking/twisting of delivery system due to excessive manipulation) may have contributed to the reported event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No ifu/labeling/training manual inadequacies were identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative action nor product risk assessment is required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key18103797
MDR Text Key327754910
Report Number2015691-2023-17361
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103207835
UDI-Public(01)00690103207835(17)250614(10)65143605
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9750CM26A
Device Lot Number65143605
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/18/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/09/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/14/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-