• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION VERCISE CARTESIA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION VERCISE CARTESIA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS Back to Search Results
Model Number DB-2202-45
Device Problems Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Migration (4003)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 11/21/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event product family, upn m365db4600c0, model db-4600-c, lot-batch 30042540.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was receiving ineffective therapy from their deep brain stimulation (dbs) system.A computed tomography (ct) scan was ordered to verify the lead position.After review of the scan it was discovered that the lead was short of target, which was the ventral intermediate (vim) nucleus of the thalamus.On the day the lead was originally placed, the postoperative scan confirmed that the lead was on target.Since the new ct showed the lead was shallow, the neurosurgeon decided to look at a postoperative x-ray that was taken 2 hours following the battery placement procedure and believes the lead looked shallow in that image.Therefore, they suspect the depth of the lead changed at some point following the first post op ct following the lead placement.The patient underwent a revision procedure in which the surgeon observed that the locking clip from the burr hole cover that is intended to secure the lead, was not secured.The physician replaced the lead and the burr hole cover.There were no patient complications, and the procedure was completed successfully.The lead will not be returned as it was discarded at the medical facility.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was receiving ineffective therapy from their deep brain stimulation (dbs) system.A computed tomography (ct) scan was ordered to verify the lead position.After review of the scan it was discovered that the lead was short of target, which was the ventral intermediate (vim) nucleus of the thalamus.On the day the lead was originally placed, the postoperative scan confirmed that the lead was on target.Since the new ct showed the lead was shallow, the neurosurgeon decided to look at a postoperative x-ray that was taken 2 hours following the battery placement procedure and believes the lead looked shallow in that image.Therefore, they suspect the depth of the lead changed at some point following the first post op ct following the lead placement.The patient underwent a revision procedure in which the surgeon observed that the locking clip from the burr hole cover that is intended to secure the lead, was not secured.The physician replaced the lead and the burr hole cover.There were no patient complications, and the procedure was completed successfully.The lead will not be returned as it was discarded at the medical facility.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Lead db-2202-45, serial (b)(6) was not returned for analysis as it was retained by the medical facility.As such, a physical analysis has not been conducted in our laboratory.A product labeling review identified that the lead was used per the instructions for use (ifu) product label.The ifu states that implanted device components (stimulator, lead, or extension) may move from original implanted location or wear through the skin, which may lead to the need for additional surgery, loss of adequate stimulation and pain, headache or discomfort are known risks with the use of deep brain stimulation.The returned burr hole cover locking clip db-4600-c, lot 30042540 was analyzed and the event was confirmed.The burr hole cover retaining clip passed the visual inspection and a known good lead was successfully attached; however, there was some difficulty with the lead clip assembly locking mechanism when securing the lead to the burr hole cover.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Lead db-2202-45, serial (b)(6) was not returned for analysis as it was retained by the medical facility.As such, a physical analysis has not been conducted in our laboratory.A product labeling review identified that the lead was used per the instructions for use (ifu) product label.The ifu states that implanted device components (stimulator, lead, or extension) may move from original implanted location or wear through the skin, which may lead to the need for additional surgery, loss of adequate stimulation and pain, headache or discomfort are known risks with the use of deep brain stimulation.The returned burr hole cover locking clip db-4600-c lot 30042540 was analyzed and the event was confirmed.The burr hole cover retaining clip passed the visual inspection and a known good lead was successfully attached; however, there was some difficulty with the lead clip assembly locking mechanism when securing the lead to the burr hole cover.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient was receiving ineffective therapy from their deep brain stimulation (dbs) system.A computed tomography (ct) scan was ordered to verify the lead position.After review of the scan it was discovered that the lead was short of target, which was the ventral intermediate (vim) nucleus of the thalamus.On the day the lead was originally placed, the postoperative scan confirmed that the lead was on target.Since the new ct showed the lead was shallow, the neurosurgeon decided to look at a postoperative x-ray that was taken 2 hours following the battery placement procedure and believes the lead looked shallow in that image.Therefore, they suspect the depth of the lead changed at some point following the first post op ct following the lead placement.The patient underwent a revision procedure in which the surgeon observed that the locking clip from the burr hole cover that is intended to secure the lead, was not secured.The physician replaced the lead and the burr hole cover.There were no patient complications, and the procedure was completed successfully.The lead will not be returned as it was discarded at the medical facility.Additional information was received that it is believed that the clip was not locked on one side from the initial implant on (b)(6) 2022.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VERCISE CARTESIA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key18111055
MDR Text Key327880938
Report Number3006630150-2023-06924
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NHL
UDI-Device Identifier08714729905288
UDI-Public08714729905288
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberDB-2202-45
Device Catalogue NumberDB-2202-45
Device Lot Number7095996
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/02/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/10/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/01/2024
04/29/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/21/2024
04/30/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/14/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-