• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. SENDIT DELIVERY DEVICE; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. SENDIT DELIVERY DEVICE; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72SDKIT
Device Problems Fracture (1260); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/17/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the m1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (mca) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a sendit delivery device (sendit), a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max) and a guidewire.During the procedure, the physician advanced the red72 and sendit to the face of the clot in the target vessel; however, while attempting to remove the sendit from the red72, the physician experienced resistance.The physician was able to remove the sendit with some force.Upon removal, it was noticed that the distal end of the sendit was not connected.Therefore, the red72 was removed and the distal end of the sendit was found inside the red72.The procedure was completed using a velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), a new red72 and the same neuron max.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned sendit confirmed that the device was fractured.The complaint indicated that resistance was experienced during removal of the device out of the red72.If the sendit device is retracted against resistance, damage such as stretching, and fracture may occur.The red72 was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the root cause of resistance could not be determined.Further evaluation revealed a kink distal to the hub.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during packaging of the device for return to penumbra.Penumbra catheters are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENDIT DELIVERY DEVICE
Type of Device
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key18114453
MDR Text Key328134742
Report Number3005168196-2023-00499
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948025943
UDI-Public815948025943
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211654
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,11/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRED72SDKIT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/31/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/18/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/10/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/06/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-