The event reported is anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Per the technical summary, the ifu, current risk mitigations include design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported event of balloon burst was unable to be confirmed due to a lack of device return or applicable imagery.In this case, available information suggests patient factors (calcification) likely contributed to the event as the customer reported that the "balloon ruptured due to calcium".The presence of calcification can create a challenging anatomy for balloon inflation.While the balloons are sufficiently designed and tested to ensure the burst pressure is at or above the rated burst pressure, calcified nodules can compromise the structure of the balloon wall via the following mechanisms such as puncture, local overstretching, open cell impingement, or stress concentration.In addition, the technical summary applies to this complaint event and establishes, through extensive complaint investigations, that balloon burst events during valve deployment have not been associated with device malfunctions or manufacturing nonconformances.Rather, the root cause for these events has been due to calcification in the landing zone or over-inflation of the balloon.The ruptured balloon profile may lead to withdrawal difficulty and/or component separation if excessive device manipulation is applied.Therefore, it is likely that these patient/procedural factors may have caused or contributed to the burst balloon during valve deployment.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
|