Catalog Number C12059 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Use of Device Problem (1670); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/30/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that two pressurewire x, wireless devices (30313g1) were used in the distal right coronary (drca) artery.The first device was selected for use, however, after insertion a kink on the device was noted.The physician attempted to use a torque device to cross the lesion, however, the device broke (separated into two pieces) at the kinked area near the proximal end of the device.Therefore, the device was removed and the procedure continued with the second device.The second device was selected for use, however, after insertion a kink on the device was noted.Although a kink on the device was noted, the physician was able to complete the procedure with the second device.The device was removed without issue.The physician was not satisfied with the wire performance.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported kink and material separation was confirmed.The reported ease of handling (poor performance) could not be tested due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.Based on the reported information and analysis of the returned pressurewire, the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.The investigation determined the cause for the reported use of device problem (poor performance) and kink/bend was due to operational context.It is likely that during the attempt to cross the lesion, while pushing against resistance, the pressurewire guidewire became damage/kinked due to the resistance encountered or force applied which then affected the device¿s performance.Additionally, with continued manipulation, the pressurewire separated at the area of the kink.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.B2 - outcomes attributed to ae updated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|