• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V2R
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to olympus, that the uretero-reno videoscope had leakage in the scope.The issue was found during maintenance.Inspection and testing of the returned device found that the angulation became locked due to deterioration of the angulation mechanism due to corrosion.There was no patient harm or user injury reported.This mdr is being submitted to capture the reportable malfunction found during the device evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned for evaluation and the customers allegation was not confirmed.It was noted that water tightness was lost due to damage on the channel tube and the bending tube could not be fixed firmly due to damage to the forceps elevator lever.The light guide connector had corrosion and the universal cord had discoloration.The control unit had corrosion due to water leakage.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, it is likely that the following led to the malfunction: it was presumed that the issue occurred due to corrosion of internal mechanism caused by fluid invasion on the control unit.It was presumed that fluid invaded from the leaking area or fluid invaded from the venting connector such as by detaching a leakage tester in water at leakage test.However, a definitive root cause cannot be identified.This issue is addressed in the instructions for use (ifu): user can detect the suggested event by handling device in accordance with ifu ¿operation manual_ inspection of the endoscope_ inspection of the angulation mechanism¿.User may be able to prevent the suggested event by handling device in accordance with the following ifu.Reprocessing manual_ leakage testing of the endoscope_ perform the leakage test - do not attach/detach the leakage tester while immersing the endoscope in the water.- if you identify a leak during leakage testing, remove the endoscope from the water with both the venting connector and the leakage tester still attached.Contact olympus regarding instructions for reprocessing a leaking endoscope in preparation for returning the endoscope to olympus for repair.Olympus will continue to monitor the field performance of this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA   965-8520
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key18160676
MDR Text Key329700035
Report Number9610595-2023-17559
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170343612
UDI-Public04953170343612
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K172246
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V2R
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/22/2023
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/31/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/31/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-